gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Chinese climate statecraft: governing low-carbon transitions through state campaigns, local adaptation and market-making

中国の気候ステートクラフト:国家キャンペーン、地域適応、市場形成を通じた低炭素移行のガバナンス (AI 翻訳)

Fangzhu Zhang, Fulong Wu, Handuo Deng

Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-09#政策Origin: CN
DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsag021
原典: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsag021

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、中国における低炭素移行の戦略的設計と都市レベルでの分散的な政策実施の乖離を、気候ステートクラフトの概念を用いて説明する。中央の命令と地方の断片的実施との緊張に対処するため、国家機関・キャンペーン、マルチスケールな行動、市場形成の三要素を分析。都市事例を通じて、中国の国家運営がいかに都市の低炭素移行を形成しているかを示す。

English

This paper explains the gap between China's strategic low-carbon transition design and fragmented urban policy implementation through the concept of climate statecraft. It analyzes three elements—state institutions/campaigns, multi-scalar actions, and market-making—as responses to tensions between central mandates and local fragmentation. Using city-level cases, it demonstrates how Chinese statecraft shapes urban low-carbon transitions.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

中国の気候ガバナンス研究だが、日本のGX政策(地域分散型エネルギー、自治体主導の脱炭素)との比較や、中央-地方間調整の示唆を得られる可能性がある。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global climate governance scholarship by examining authoritarian environmentalism and urban low-carbon transitions in China, offering insights for comparative studies on state-led decarbonization versus decentralized approaches.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Scholars studying climate governance, authoritarian environmentalism, or urban energy transitions will find a nuanced framework connecting central statecraft to local implementation.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers interested in China's climate strategy can learn about the interplay between campaigns, local adaptation, and market mechanisms in driving low-carbon transitions.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Abstract As the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases, China has announced its push toward carbon neutrality. However, a more strategic design for low-carbon transition contrasts with dispersed policy implementation in cities. This article attributes the puzzle to an insufficient understanding of statecraft, which translates decarbonisation visions into urban practices. Engaging with the decentralisation–centralisation debate in authoritarian environmentalism and the contextualised understanding of neoliberal environmentalism in China, we posit that climate statecraft—through state institutions and campaigns, multi-scalar actions and market-making—represents a direct response to the persisting tensions between central mandates and fragmented implementation. Drawing on city-level cases, we demonstrate how Chinese statecraft is shaping China’s urban low-carbon transition.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。