gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Mapping ESD competencies in civil engineering: a scoping review

土木工学におけるESDコンピテンシーのマッピング:スコーピングレビュー (AI 翻訳)

Norashikin Ahmad Kamal, C. K. C. Che Ibrahim

International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-24#その他対象セクター: construction
DOI: 10.1108/ijshe-08-2025-0976
原典: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-08-2025-0976

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、土木工学における持続可能性教育(ESD)のコンピテンシーフレームワークを開発したスコーピングレビューである。8つのコンピテンシー(システム思考、予測、規範、戦略、協働、批判的思考、自己認識、統合的課題解決)を5つの実践要素(カリキュラム、教育法、評価、技術利用、制度的支援)にマッピング。126本の論文を分析し、システム思考と予測が最も多く見られ、自己認識と統合的課題解決が最も少ないことを発見した。提案されたフレームワークは、土木工学プログラムにおけるESDコンピテンシー開発の設計・評価に役立つ。

English

This scoping review develops an ESD competency framework tailored to civil engineering, mapping eight competencies (systems thinking, anticipatory, normative, strategic, collaboration, critical thinking, self-awareness, integrated problem solving) across five practice elements (curriculum, pedagogy, assessment, technology use, institutional support). Analyzing 126 articles, it finds systems thinking and anticipatory most evidenced, self-awareness and integrated problem solving least. The framework aids curriculum mapping and accreditation.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、土木工学における持続可能性教育の重要性が高まっており、本フレームワークはJABEEなどの認定基準への対応に活用できる。特に、インフラ整備における脱炭素化や防災・減災の観点からも、ESDコンピテンシーの体系的な育成が求められる。

In the global GX context

This paper provides a structured competency framework that aligns with global trends in engineering education for sustainability. While not directly addressing climate disclosure, it supports the integration of sustainability competencies into civil engineering curricula, which is relevant for GX workforce development.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Use this framework as a basis for designing ESD assessments and curriculum alignment in civil engineering programs.

🏢実務担当者:Apply this framework to map your civil engineering program's sustainability competencies across curricular and institutional elements.

🏛政策担当者:Consider this framework when updating accreditation standards for civil engineering education to include sustainability competencies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Despite numerous efforts to understand education for sustainable development (ESD) in engineering, understanding within civil engineering remains limited. This study aims to formulate an ESD competency framework tailored to civil engineering and shows how eight competencies are embedded across five reinforcing elements of practice: curriculum, pedagogy, assessment, technology use and institutional support. A scoping review following the PRISMA for Scoping Review (PRISMA ScR) framework was conducted using Scopus as the primary database, covering peer reviewed journal articles published from 1999 to 2025. The final data set of 126 articles was used to map the eight ESD competencies; systems thinking, anticipatory, normative, strategic, collaboration, critical thinking, self-awareness and integrated problem solving against the five elements. A consultation with one accredited civil engineering programme used open-ended interview and document review, analysed via content analysis mapped to the competency element matrix to identify appraised clarity, fit and implementation gaps. The review finds systems thinking and anticipatory most frequently evidenced, followed by normative and strategic; collaboration and critical thinking are common but variably operationalised, while self-awareness and integrated problem solving are least represented. Evidence concentrates in curriculum and assessment for systems and critical thinking, pedagogy for collaboration and institutional support for anticipatory, with limited coverage of technology use. ESD competency in civil engineering requires an integrated blend of tacit and explicit knowledge, technical and interpersonal skills and practice-based experience. The study presents a concise framework mapping eight competencies to five elements, and a consultation demonstrates applicability and targeted improvements. The framework provides programmes with a clear map to align curriculum, pedagogy, assessment, technology use and institutional support with the eight ESD competencies, generating evidence needed for sustainability related accreditation. It can guide curriculum mapping and gap analysis, syllabus and rubric development and revision and the formalisation of external projects and reviews, thereby improving assurance of learning outcome and graduate readiness for sustainability informed civil engineering practice. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by developing a civil engineering specific translation and operationalisation layer that links the established eight ESD competencies to five reinforcing programme elements: curriculum, pedagogy, assessment, technology use and institutional support. By theorising these elements as under specified variables within existing competency frameworks, the study provides an evidence grounded structure for programme level design, implementation and evaluation of ESD competency development in civil engineering education.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。