炭素植栽の生物多様性の共便益を特定し定量化するためのガイドライン

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:Provides a standardized, replicable methodology for quantifying biodiversity co-benefits, enabling empirical comparisons across projects.

🏢実務担当者:Offers clear steps for integrating biodiversity measurement into carbon planting projects, facilitating compliance with TNFD and CSRD disclosure requirements.

🏛政策担当者:Supports the design of regulatory frameworks that reward biodiversity outcomes alongside carbon sequestration in crediting mechanisms.

碳植树是对减缓气候变化的重要贡献。虽然植树主要用于碳封存，但存在生物多样性协同效益的潜力，尤其是当植树反映当地参考生态系统并包含具有多种功能性状的本土物种混合时。随着全球碳植树持续增加，生物多样性协同效益的潜力也随之增大。 生物多样性协同效益与新兴的生物多样性市场、欧洲新的恢复法律以及自然向好未来的全球愿景目标相关。由于测量生物多样性协同效益比测量碳封存更为复杂，项目支持者中普遍存在不确定性。虽然有标准化的碳封存测量方法，但针对从业者如何识别和量化生物多样性协同效益的指导却很少。 在此，我们基于真实世界案例研究，提出实用指南，用于识别生物多样性碳植树中的潜在生物多样性价值及其后续量化。关键要素包括桌面分析以识别景观和生态系统背景，包括受威胁生态系统和物种，以及威胁过程。我们提供关于在基线和参考状态下监测关键非生物和生物生态系统特征的方法指导。 实际意义 。这些指南允许将测量的生物多样性成果与现有框架（如自然资本核算标准和自然相关财务披露框架）整合。这些框架正被全球企业日益采用，以评估和报告其自然相关影响、依赖和风险。这些框架共同对于确保企业对自然向好未来的财务投资为本土生态系统和人类带来净效益至关重要。

AI 翻訳（deepseek-v4-flash）。 正確を期す場合は下の原文を参照してください。

Carbon plantings are a vital contribution to mitigate climate change. While plantings are primarily done for carbon sequestration, there is potential for biodiversity co‐benefits, particularly when plantings mirror the local reference ecosystem and comprise a mix of native species with a variety of functional traits. With the continued rise of carbon plantings globally, the potential for biodiversity co‐benefits also increases. Biodiversity co‐benefits are relevant to emerging biodiversity markets, new restoration laws in Europe and global aspirational goals for a Nature Positive future. Uncertainty among proponents is prevalent because measuring biodiversity co‐benefits is more complex than measuring carbon sequestration. While there are standardised methodologies for measuring carbon sequestration, there is little guidance for practitioners on how to identify and quantify biodiversity co‐benefits. Here, we present practical guidelines, informed by a real‐world case study, for identifying potential biodiversity values and their subsequent quantification in biodiverse carbon plantings. Key elements include desktop analyses to identify the landscape and ecosystem context, including threatened ecosystems and species, and threatening processes. We provide guidance on monitoring approaches for key abiotic and biotic ecosystem characteristics at baseline and reference states. Practical implications . These guidelines allow integration of measured biodiversity outcomes with existing frameworks such as Natural Capital Accounting standards and Nature‐related Financial Disclosure frameworks. These are increasingly implemented by businesses worldwide to assess and report their nature‐related impacts, dependencies and risks. Together, these frameworks are necessary to ensure that corporations' financial investments in a Nature Positive future result in a net benefit for native ecosystems and people.

• semanticscholar https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/2688-8319.70184first seen 2026-06-29 08:48:04 · last seen 2026-09-21 05:17:08