From Brundtland to Net-Zero Buildings: Governing Sustainable Development in the Built Environment
ブルントラントからネットゼロ建築へ：建築環境における持続可能な開発のガバナンス (AI 翻訳)
Mingliang Li, Hengjie Duan, Yiying Wang, Zhanlue Lin, Xintian Yu, Hongyu Zhao
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、ブルントラント報告書以降の持続可能な開発の定義が建築環境において運用困難である点を指摘し、明確な境界、最低限の開示、保証ロジックを含む更新経路を提案する。特に、全ライフカーボン会計と運用エネルギーの指標化、既存のネットゼロ・グリーンビルツールへの調和を重視している。
English
This paper identifies weaknesses in the Brundtland definition of sustainable development for the built environment and proposes an update pathway with explicit boundaries, minimum disclosures, and assurance logic. It emphasizes whole-life carbon accounting, operational energy performance, and harmonization across existing net-zero and green building tools.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJや建築物省エネ法が進む中、本提案は建築物のカーボン会計と開示の実務的枠組みとして参考になる。特に、運用段階とライフサイクル全体の排出量を統合するアプローチは、今後の建築GX政策に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, with ISSB, CSRD, and net-zero pledges, this paper addresses the operationalization gap between sustainable development principles and building governance. Its proposed minimum indicator set and assurance logic can inform disclosure standards like TCFD and green building certifications.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a conceptual framework for studying building governance and carbon accounting integration.
🏢実務担当者:Suggests practical indicators for whole-life carbon and operational energy to enhance building certifications.
🏛政策担当者:Offers a pathway for regulatory updates to include explicit boundaries and assurance in building codes.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Since the Brundtland Report (1987), its definition has anchored sustainable development. An EBSCOhost co-mention scan (1987–2025) finds 259,112 records linking “sustainable development” with the Brundtland Report—used only as a descriptive attention proxy, sensitive to coverage, indexing, keywords, and residual duplicates. We then analyze concept-to-implementation barriers in building governance and propose an update pathway: explicit boundaries, minimum disclosures, and assurance logic. Yet in the built environment—characterized by long-lived assets, carbon lock-in, and net-zero commitments—the definition is difficult to operationalize without explicit boundaries, measurable indicators, and auditable trade-offs. We identify two concept-level weaknesses: (1) the definition reflects late-twentieth-century socio-technical conditions and offers limited guidance for practice shaped by digitalized delivery and operations, accelerated climate policy, and whole-life carbon accounting; and (2) its openness around “needs,” “harm,” and trade-offs enables boundary ambiguity (e.g., operational versus embodied emissions), fragmented standards and certifications, and greenwashing risks. We propose a built-environment update pathway that (i) operationalizes “needs” and “harm” through a minimum life-cycle indicator set linking affordability and occupant well-being with operational energy performance and whole-life carbon outcomes; and (ii) strengthens concept-consistent implementation via harmonized boundary declarations and verification principles across existing net-zero and green building tools, supported by targeted AEC capacity building.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16040789first seen 2026-06-29 08:55:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。