Home heating transition in Finland, Romania, Sweden and the United Kingdom through the combined lens of energy democracy, energy citizenship and energy justice
フィンランド、ルーマニア、スウェーデン、英国における家庭用暖房の移行：エネルギーの民主主義、エネルギー市民権、エネルギー正義の複合レンズを通して (AI 翻訳)
Jenny Palm, Aimee Ambrose, Kathy Davies, Sarah Kilpeläinen, Jenny von Platten, George Jiglău, Sofie Pelsmakers, Raúl Castaño-Rosa, Anca Sinea
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、フィンランド、ルーマニア、スウェーデン、英国の家庭用暖房移行を比較し、エネルギー民主主義・市民権・正義の枠組みを用いて分析する。所有形態、日常実践、不平等が市民の役割をどう形成するかを検討し、各国の文脈によって市民の関与が大きく異なることを明らかにした。政策提言として、参加型ガバナンス、公正な規制、脆弱世帯への支援の必要性を強調する。
English
This paper compares home heating transitions in Finland, Romania, Sweden, and the United Kingdom using an integrated framework of energy democracy, energy citizenship, and energy justice. It reveals that citizen engagement is shaped by infrastructures, welfare regimes, and historical legacies rather than individual choice. The study calls for context-sensitive policies that promote participatory governance, equitable regulation, and support for vulnerable households.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では暖房に灯油や電気が多く使われ、断熱性能の低い住宅も多い。欧州の事例は、日本の暖房の脱炭素化における市民参加や公正な移行の設計に示唆を与える。特に、地域熱供給や市場自由化の影響に関する分析は参考になる。
In the global GX context
This comparative study contributes to global scholarship on just transitions by analyzing how governance models, daily practices, and inequalities intersect in heating decarbonization. It offers an analytical framework applicable to other regions, highlighting the need for democratic and participatory approaches beyond technological fixes.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides an integrated framework (democracy, citizenship, justice) for analyzing energy transitions, useful for socio-technical transition scholars.
🏛政策担当者:Offers insights for designing heating policies that account for national contexts, citizen participation, and equity.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Background Heating is a key challenge for Europe’s decarbonisation goals, accounting for a large share of energy use and emissions while shaping everyday life, comfort, and vulnerability. This article compares home heating transitions in Finland, Romania, Sweden, and the United Kingdom through an integrated framework combining energy democracy, energy citizenship, and energy justice. The study examines how ownership, everyday practices, and inequality intersect to shape citizen roles in heating transitions across diverse political and infrastructural contexts. Results Based on archival and secondary material, the analysis reveals strong contextual variation in how citizens engage with heating systems. In Finland and Sweden, municipally owned district heating offers collective stability but limited direct agency. In Romania, the collapse of state-controlled networks has left households dependent on individual and often inefficient systems. In the United Kingdom, liberalised markets promise consumer choice but deepen vulnerability through cost pressures and weak accountability. Across all cases, household participation is structured by infrastructures, welfare regimes, and historical legacies rather than by individual choice. Integrating democracy, citizenship, and justice highlights how governance models, daily practices, and inequalities interact in shaping heating transitions. Conclusions Citizen-centred heating transitions require policy approaches sensitive to national contexts and social realities. Empowerment must go beyond rhetoric to include participatory governance in collective systems, equitable regulation in liberalised markets, and targeted support for vulnerable households. The study contributes an analytical framework that captures the social depth of decarbonisation and supports the design of heating transitions that are democratic, participatory, and just.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-026-00587-7first seen 2026-06-29 05:01:27 · last seen 2026-06-29 05:01:34
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。