Circular Climate Action and Natural Hazard Resilience: a Review of Trends, Threats, and Targets for achieving SDG 13
循環型気候行動と自然災害に対するレジリエンス：SDG13達成に向けた動向、脅威、目標のレビュー (AI 翻訳)
G. Halkos, Panagiotis-Stavros Aslanidis
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、2010年から2025年までの52件の研究と1件の報告書を対象に、循環型気候行動（CCA）の枠組みを提案し、地域別・所得グループ別のSDG13達成状況のギャップを分析。低所得国が高所得国よりSDG13に近いというパラドックスを指摘し、アジアの死亡率、アフリカの災害、欧州の熱波、アメリカの経済損失、小島嶼国の脆弱性を明らかに。予防・準備、Build-Back-Better、生態系を基盤とした防災、先住民知識の活用を提言。
English
This review of 52 studies and 1 report (2010-2025) proposes a circular climate action (CCA) framework to analyze SDG 13 trends across regions and income groups. Findings reveal a paradox: low-income countries appear closer to SDG 13, while high-income countries lag due to high material footprints. Regionally, Asia has highest mortality, Africa faces hydrological hazards, Europe heatwave mortality, Americas wildfire losses, and SIDS extreme climate exposure. Policy recommendations include prevention, build-back-better, Eco-DRR, and indigenous knowledge.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は台風・地震・熱波など自然災害に直面し、循環経済と気候変動適応の統合が重要。本レビューのCCAフレームワークは、日本の防災政策（国土強靱化）やSDGs達成に向けた企業・自治体の取り組みと親和性が高く、特に生態系を活用した防災（Eco-DRR）やBuild-Back-Betterの視点は実務に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This review contributes to the global discourse on integrating circular economy with climate adaptation and disaster risk reduction, relevant for the Sendai Framework, Paris Agreement, and SDG 13. Its cross-regional analysis can inform international policy and national adaptation plans worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This review provides a comprehensive framework (CCA) and cross-regional analysis that can guide future research on circular climate action and disaster resilience.
🏢実務担当者:Policymakers and disaster risk managers can use the CCA framework and regional insights to align circular economy and climate adaptation strategies.
🏛政策担当者:The findings highlight the need for prevention-oriented policies and inclusion of indigenous knowledge in national adaptation plans.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The current multi-crisis hinders progress toward the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 progress and we aim to identify gaps and opportunities in SDG 13 trends across geographic regions and income groups through a proposed holistic “circular climate action” (CCA) framework. The literature search was conducted in December 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Records published between 2010 and 2025 were identified through Scopus and Web of Science and supplemented by Google Scholar. Rigorous screening and exclusion criteria were applied to ensure methodological reliability. The review includes 52 studies and 1 report. We define CCA, and the findings reveal a paradox: many low-income countries appear closer to SDG 13, while high-income countries lag due to high material and ecological footprints and limited circularity. Regionally, Asia bears the highest mortality burden, Africa faces major biological and hydrological hazards, Europe is vulnerable to heatwave mortality, the Americas suffer major economic losses from wildfires and storms, and finally, small-island developing states (SIDS) remain highly exposed to extreme climatic phenomena. Policymakers should prioritize prevention and preparedness through build-back-better (BBB) strategies, Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR), and the inclusion of local and Indigenous knowledge. The review is limited by its non-meta-analytic design, which relies on qualitative synthesis; therefore, a formal risk-of-bias assessment was not conducted. The review protocol was registered on OSF (registration ID T7QFG).
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43615-026-01039-2.pdffirst seen 2026-07-06 05:24:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。