Evolution of Carbon Markets in Australia – Policy Lessons for the ASEAN Based on a Review of Design Features and Performance
オーストラリア炭素市場の進化－ASEAN向け政策教訓：デザイン特徴と実績のレビュー (AI 翻訳)
Rabindra Nepal, Muhammad Ayaz, Ashish Agalgaonkar, Han Phoumin
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文はASEANの炭素市場構築に向けて、オーストラリアの炭素価格メカニズムの設計と実績をレビューし、政策教訓を導出する。オーストラリアの失敗（2014年の炭素価格撤廃、電力部門の排出制限欠如）を踏まえ、排出上限の設定、市場取引、政府支援の重要性を指摘。また、炭素市場によるグリーン収入創出の可能性を探り、燃料税や排出枠オークション、国際オフセットへの参加を提案する。
English
This chapter reviews the design and performance of Australia's carbon pricing mechanism to derive policy lessons for ASEAN. It warns against copying Australia's mistakes, such as the 2014 repeal and lack of limits on the electricity sector. It emphasizes capped emissions, market trading, and government support, and suggests using carbon markets for green revenue via fuel taxes, allowance auctions, and international offsets.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
ASEAN対象の議論だが、日本の炭素市場設計や二国間クレジット制度（JCM）の改善にも示唆を与える。特に排出量取引の制度設計や国際連携の観点で参考になる。
In the global GX context
Australia's carbon market evolution offers lessons for emerging market designs globally. The chapter's focus on policy missteps and revenue generation is relevant for regions like the EU and North America that are refining carbon pricing mechanisms.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured comparison of carbon market design features and performance outcomes, useful for policy evaluation studies.
🏢実務担当者:Energy and carbon market firms can learn about design pitfalls and revenue mechanisms from the Australian experience.
🏛政策担当者:Key lessons for regulators designing carbon markets, especially avoiding the exclusion of key sectors and ensuring enforcement.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ASEAN has a climate policy objective of setting up interoperable carbon markets to achieve its carbon neutrality agenda but needs guidance in establishing a regional carbon market. This chapter, therefore, reviews the design features of the existing carbon pricing mechanism in Australia, which remains an important trading and economic partner of the ASEAN, hypothesising that the ASEAN can learn valuable lessons from the Australian carbon market experience. The objective of this chapter is to derive policy lessons for ASEAN in the context of establishing functioning carbon markets based on the Australian experience by understanding the role of capped emissions, market trading, and government support for emissions reductions. The chapter also finds that ASEAN should not follow the footsteps of Australia in its carbon market design, such as the repeal of carbon pricing in 2014, as well as the exclusion of the emission-intensive electricity sector by not imposing legislated limits on the emissions levels. ASEAN should explore the possibility of raising revenues from carbon markets in an era of unprecedented demand for green financing. Cost-reflective fuel excise taxes, auction-based issuance of carbon allowances, and participation in international carbon offset schemes can be effective solutions not only to mitigate and adapt to climate change but also to generate a viable source of green revenue for ASEAN. The importance of clear environmental policies and strong enforcement for the successful operation of a carbon market should serve as a valuable lesson to ASEAN from the Australian experience.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003688105-10first seen 2026-06-29 04:53:52 · last seen 2026-06-29 04:53:53
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。