Triaxial Response and Elastoplastic Constitutive Model for Artificially Cemented Granular Materials
人工セメント固化粒状材料の三軸応答と弾塑性構成モデル (AI 翻訳)
Xiaochun Yu, Yuchen Ye, Anyu Yang, Jie Yang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文では、低炭素建設材料として注目される人工セメント固化粒状材料(ACG)の力学挙動を統一的に記述する弾塑性構成モデルを提案。低セメント量のセメント砂礫(LCSG)を含む多様な材料データを用いた検証で、ピーク応力誤差1.36%、ピーク体積ひずみ誤差3.78%と高い予測精度を示した。このモデルはダム建設や地盤補強など持続可能な土木工事へのACG適用の理論的基盤を提供する。
English
This paper proposes a unified elastoplastic constitutive model for artificially cemented granular (ACG) materials, emphasizing low-carbon variants like low-cement-content cemented sand and gravel (LCSG). The model, validated on diverse materials including LCSG and cemented coal-gangue backfill, predicts peak deviatoric stress with 1.36% error and peak volumetric strain with 3.78% error. It provides a theoretical basis for using ACG in low-carbon dam construction and foundation rehabilitation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では建設分野の脱炭素化が急務であり、低セメント材料の活用が期待される。本モデルは、多様なACG材料の力学的設計を統一化することで、実務適用を促進し、日本の低炭素インフラ整備に貢献する。
In the global GX context
Globally, low-carbon construction materials are critical for sustainable infrastructure. This constitutive model bridges the gap between material variability and design reliability, enabling wider adoption of low-cement, locally sourced aggregates in civil engineering projects, aligning with net-zero targets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Geotechnical engineers and modelers gain a transferable elastoplastic framework for various cemented granular materials, validated across multiple datasets.
🏢実務担当者:Construction firms can use the model to design low-carbon cementitious materials like LCSG, ensuring structural performance while reducing embodied carbon.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Because artificially cemented granular (ACG) materials employ diverse combinations of aggregates and binders—including cemented soil, low-cement-content cemented sand and gravel (LCSG), and concrete—their stress–strain responses vary widely. In LCSG, the binder dosage is typically limited to 40–80 kg/m3 and the sand–gravel skeleton is often obtained directly from on-site or nearby excavation spoil, endowing the material with a markedly lower embodied carbon footprint and strong alignment with current low-carbon, green-construction objectives. Yet, such heterogeneity makes a single material-specific constitutive model inadequate for predicting the mechanical behavior of other ACG variants, thereby constraining broader applications in dam construction and foundation reinforcement. This study systematically summarizes and analyzes the stress–strain and volumetric strain–axial strain characteristics of ACG materials under conventional triaxial conditions. Generalized hyperbolic and parabolic equations are employed to describe these two families of curves, and closed-form expressions are proposed for key mechanical indices—peak strength, elastic modulus, and shear dilation behavior. Building on generalized plasticity theory, we derive the plastic flow direction vector, loading direction vector, and plastic modulus, and develop a concise, transferable elastoplastic model suitable for the full spectrum of ACG materials. Validation against triaxial data for rock-fill materials, LCSG, and cemented coal–gangue backfill shows that the model reproduces the stress and deformation paths of each material class with high accuracy. Quantitative evaluation of the peak values indicates that the proposed constitutive model predicts peak deviatoric stress with an error of 1.36% and peak volumetric strain with an error of 3.78%. The corresponding coefficients of determination R2 between the predicted and measured values are 0.997 for peak stress and 0.987 for peak volumetric strain, demonstrating the excellent engineering accuracy of the proposed model. The results provide a unified theoretical basis for deploying ACG—particularly its low-cement, locally sourced variants—in low-carbon dam construction, foundation rehabilitation, and other sustainable civil engineering projects.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152721first seen 2026-06-29 04:51:39 · last seen 2026-07-05 04:41:57
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。