Tell me a story I can believe in: Aligning framing with personal values in energy transition narratives
信じられる物語を語ってください:エネルギー転換のナラティブにおけるフレーミングと個人の価値観の調整 (AI 翻訳)
Romée Lammers, Sikke R. Jansma, Bernard P. Veldkamp, Matthias de Visser, Jordy F. Gosselt
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、エネルギー転換に関するメッセージフレーミングが公衆の態度や行動意図に与える影響を、オランダの成人を対象としたオンライン実験により検証。ナラティブの視点(単数形vs複数形)や結果(獲得vs損失)のフレーミング単独では効果は限定的だが、個人の価値観に合わせたフレーミングは効果を高めることを明らかにした。戦略的コミュニケーションには画一的でない調整が必要。
English
This study examines how narrative framing (point-of-view and outcome) influences energy transition attitudes and behavioral intentions via an online experiment with Dutch adults. While framing alone had limited effects, aligning frames with personal values (e.g., singular perspective for self-enhancement, gain frames for openness-to-change) significantly increased effectiveness. Results highlight the need for tailored rather than one-size-fits-all communication strategies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもエネルギー転換への市民参加が課題となっており、本研究成果は、画一的なメッセージではなく、個人の価値観に合わせたコミュニケーション設計の重要性を示す。日本企業や自治体の広報戦略に応用可能。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global GX communication research by empirically demonstrating that aligning narrative framing with audience values enhances engagement. It challenges one-size-fits-all approaches common in corporate and policy messaging, offering a nuanced framework for tailoring communication across diverse cultural contexts.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides experimental evidence on the interaction between framing and personal values in energy transition communication, offering a methodological template for further studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers actionable insights for designing targeted messaging campaigns that resonate with different value segments to increase public support for energy transition.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for differentiated communication strategies rather than uniform messaging to foster broader societal engagement with decarbonization goals.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Successfully transitioning to decarbonized energy systems requires broad public engagement, yet citizens often remain disconnected from transition goals, including in the Netherlands. In response, message framing has frequently been proposed as a way to enhance engagement. At the same time, environmental psychology research suggests that environmental attitudes and behaviors are shaped by people's personal values, raising doubts about whether framing can work as a one-size-fits-all solution. Drawing on framing, narrative, and value theories, this study examines how narrative-based framing (first-person singular vs. plural point-of-view; gain vs. loss outcomes) may shape audience's energy transition attitudes and behavioral intentions. An online survey experiment ( N = 365) using a 2 × 2 between-subjects design was conducted among Dutch adults. Findings revealed limited direct effects of point-of-view and outcome framing on attitudes and intentions. However, framing effectiveness increased when aligned with audience values; singular perspectives resonated more with self-enhancement-oriented individuals, whereas plural perspectives better aligned with self-transcendence values. Similarly, gain frames were most effective for openness-to-change-oriented values, whereas loss frames resonated more with conservation-oriented individuals. These results underscore the importance of aligning framing with audience values to broaden transition engagement, highlighting that strategic communication efforts must be tailored rather than universally applied. • Narrative framing alone minimally impacts audience responses. • Matching narrative frames to audience values increases their effect. • Framing effects are strongest on attitudes towards the narrative itself.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104741first seen 2026-05-25 04:39:54 · last seen 2026-05-27 04:32:01
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。