More than a footnote? The evolution of community engagement in coastal nature-based solutions research
単なる脚注以上のもの？沿岸自然を基盤としたソリューション研究におけるコミュニティ関与の進化 (AI 翻訳)
Catarina Jóia Santos, José Carlos Ferreira, Michael W. Beck
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は2000〜2025年の沿岸自然を基盤としたソリューション（NBS）研究におけるコミュニティ関与の概念化と運用を統合文献レビューで分析。824件から281件を対象に、参加のはしご理論を応用した4段階で関与をコード化した。2016年以降の発表増加や関与言及の増加傾向は見られるものの、64%の論文に関与内容がなく、関与があるものも概念的レベルが主流で、実践的参加は限定的である。
English
This integrative literature review examines community engagement in coastal nature-based solutions (NBS) research from 2000 to 2025. Among 281 publications from 824 records, 64% contained no engagement content, and where present (36%), it was predominantly at a conceptual level (Level 1) rather than participatory co-development (Level 3). Despite increased engagement visibility after 2016, reported participatory practice remains limited.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では気候変動適応策としてマングローブや干潟などのNBSが注目されるが、本論文は地域コミュニティの関与が不十分であると指摘。日本のNBSプロジェクトにおいても、実質的な参加型アプローチの導入が求められる。
In the global GX context
As nature-based solutions gain traction in global climate adaptation, this paper reveals a persistent gap between the normative discourse of community engagement and its operationalization. For practitioners and funders, it underscores the need to move beyond tokenistic consultation toward genuine participatory processes.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Highlights the need for empirical studies that document and evaluate participatory methods in coastal NBS contexts.
🏢実務担当者:Emphasizes that project design should integrate community engagement beyond consultation, aligning with social legitimacy and long-term effectiveness.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that funding criteria and monitoring frameworks should require evidence of meaningful stakeholder participation in NBS projects.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Nature-based solutions (NBS) are increasingly popular as a coastal climate adaptation measure, yet their long-term effectiveness depends not only on biophysical performance, but also on social legitimacy and meaningful community engagement. This study examines how community engagement has been conceptualized and operationalized as reported in peer-reviewed coastal NBS research over 2000-2025 through an integrative literature review. From 824 records, 281 publications met the inclusion criteria and were analysed using structured content analysis. Ecosystem types were recorded and engagement was coded using a four-level scheme, adapting Arnstein’s ladder of participation specifically to coastal NBS research: Level 0 (no engagement content), Level 1 (normative/conceptual mention), Level 2 (consultation-based methods), and Level 3 (participatory co-development). Mangroves and saltmarshes were the most frequently studied ecosystems, consistent with their protective functions and prominence as blue carbon ecosystems. No consistent association was identified between ecosystem type and engagement prevalence. Publication output increased markedly after 2016, and the share of studies referencing engagement rose between 2021 and 2025. However, 64% of publications contained no engagement content. Among the 102 engagement-referencing studies, Level 1 dominated (n = 58), while Levels 2 and 3 were less common (n = 22 each). Proportionally, non-empirical studies referenced engagement more often than empirical studies, but exclusively at Level 1; Levels 2-3 occurred only in empirical research. Overall, engagement has become more visible in coastal NBS research, but this has not translated into a proportional increase in reported participatory practice within the academic literature.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2026.100358first seen 2026-06-29 05:26:36 · last seen 2026-06-29 05:26:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。