GREEN OUTSOURCING IN GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS: FROM TRANSACTION COST MINIMISATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL CAPABILITY RECOMBINATION
グローバル・バリューチェーンにおけるグリーン・アウトソーシング:取引費用最小化から環境ケイパビリティ再結合へ (AI 翻訳)
V. Namoniuk, A.I. Maliuha
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、取引費用経済学や資源ベース理論が環境制約を軽視してきた理論的ギャップを指摘し、「生態学的資産特殊性」という概念を導入。グローバル・バリューチェーンにおけるモジュラー型ガバナンスが環境能力開発を阻害する一方、関係型ガバナンスがイノベーションオフセットを促進すると論じる。最終的に、グリーン・アウトソーシングを環境能力再結合と捉え直し、企業の競争優位源泉として位置づける。
English
This conceptual paper identifies a theoretical gap in transaction cost economics regarding environmental constraints. It introduces 'ecological asset specificity' as a governance variable and argues that modular governance in global value chains discourages relational investment needed for environmental capability development, while relational governance enables innovation offsets. It reconceptualizes green outsourcing as environmental capability recombination for sustainability-driven competitive advantage.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業はSSBJ基準に基づくScope3開示やサプライチェーン排出削減に直面しており、本稿はアウトソーシング先との環境投資の相互依存関係を理論化することで、実務上のガバナンスリスク(環境資産の座礁や規制エクスポージャー)を捉える枠組みを提供する。
In the global GX context
This paper extends global value chain governance theory to incorporate environmental dimensions, offering a framework relevant to ISSB S2, CSRD, and SEC climate rules that require companies to manage and disclose supply chain emissions. It provides a theoretical basis for understanding why relational governance may be necessary for effective scope 3 decarbonization.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a novel theoretical extension integrating environmental concerns into transaction cost economics and GVC governance typologies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers guidance on structuring outsourcing relationships to balance flexibility with environmental capability co-investment.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights governance risks arising from environmental asset specificity that supply chain regulations should address.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The governance of outsourcing decisions in multinational enterprises has been theorised extensively through transaction cost economics, property rights theory, and the resource-based view. However, these frameworks, developed largely without reference to environmental constraints, provide insufficient guidance for firms navigating the demands of supply chain decarbonisation, scope 3 emissions accountability, and green value chain transformation. This article identifies a fundamental theoretical gap and proposes a conceptual extension to address it. The concept of ecological asset specificity, the degree of mutual dependency created through joint environmental investment and regulatory interdependence between supply chain partners, as a distinct governance variable absent from Williamson’s original typology were introduced. It is argued that this omission has practical consequences: firms that have made significant co-investments in supplier environmental capability face governance risks, including environmental asset stranding and regulatory exposure, that existing contractual frameworks cannot adequately anticipate or mitigate. Drawing on Gereffi, Humphrey, and Sturgeon’s global value chain governance typology, it is demonstrated that modular governance architectures, though widely adopted for their flexibility advantages, create structural disincentives for the relational investment that genuine environmental capability development requires. Relational governance, by contrast, provides the organisational conditions under which innovation offsets of the kind described by Porter and van der Linde can be realised at the supply chain level. The article culminates in a reconceptualisation of green outsourcing as a form of environmental capability recombination – a strategic practice through which MNEs assemble and develop environmental resources across organisational and national boundaries. This framing, grounded in Verbeke’s internalisation theory, repositions outsourcing from a cost arbitrage instrument to a platform for sustainability-driven competitive advantage. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed, and directions for future empirical research are identified.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.17721/apmv.2026.166.1.200-216first seen 2026-05-05 22:10:59
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。