gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Tillage, No-till, and Climate-smart Farming: A Critical Review of Long-term Sustainability Outcomes

耕うん、不耕起、気候スマート農業:長期的な持続可能性の成果に関する批判的レビュー (AI 翻訳)

Suraj R. Jadhav, Sagar A Kamble, S. Patil, D. Raut, S. Shende

Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-25#気候科学Origin: Global対象セクター: agriculture
DOI: 10.9734/ajsspn/2026/v12i3700
原典: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2026/v12i3700

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本レビューは、慣行耕うん、不耕起、保全農業の長期的持続可能性を、気候スマート農業の枠組みから批判的に検討した。不耕起は土壌物理性や水保全に有効だが、GHG削減効果は限定的で状況依存性が高い。作物収量への影響は地域や管理方法により異なり、小規模農家への普及障壁も大きい。統合的で状況に応じた耕うん戦略の必要性を強調している。

English

This critical review examines conventional tillage, no-till, and conservation agriculture within the climate-smart agriculture framework. No-till improves soil physical properties and water conservation but has limited and context-dependent greenhouse gas mitigation benefits. Yield responses vary by crop and management, with adoption barriers for smallholders. The paper calls for integrated, site-specific tillage strategies.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の農業政策においても、土壌炭素貯留や温室効果ガス削減が注目されている。本レビューは、不耕起栽培の導入効果が一律でないことを示しており、日本の水田や畑作への適用には地域条件を考慮した慎重な評価が求められることを示唆する。

In the global GX context

As climate-smart agriculture gains traction globally, this review provides a nuanced assessment of no-till's role in mitigation and adaptation. It underscores that carbon sequestration claims require scrutiny and that adoption must be tailored to local contexts, informing both policy and practice under the Paris Agreement and national climate plans.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive synthesis of tillage impacts on sustainability, highlighting research gaps in deep-soil carbon and N2O dynamics.

🏢実務担当者:Offers evidence that no-till benefits are not universal; practitioners should assess local soil, climate, and crop conditions before adoption.

🏛政策担当者:Caution against blanket promotion of no-till; policies should support integrated approaches with cover crops and rotations, and address smallholder barriers.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Tillage management lies at the heart of debates about sustainable agriculture, soil health, and climate change mitigation. As global interest in conservation agriculture and climate-smart farming intensifies, a rigorous reassessment of the long-term sustainability outcomes of tillage and no-till systems has become essential. This article presents a critical narrative review of the peer-reviewed literature on the agronomic, environmental, and socioeconomic dimensions of conventional tillage, no-till, and conservation agriculture, considered within the emerging framework of climate-smart agriculture. The evidence reveals a nuanced picture: no-till management offers meaningful benefits for soil physical properties, aggregate stability, water conservation, and reduced fuel emissions, but its role as a net greenhouse gas mitigation strategy is more limited and context-dependent than commonly assumed. While no-till often concentrates soil organic carbon in surface horizons, evidence for consistent deep-profile gains remains contested. Nitrous oxide emissions show mixed patterns that are strongly influenced by climate, soil drainage, and duration of practice. Crop yield responses to no-till vary considerably by crop type, aridity, and companion management practices; the integration of cover cropping and diverse crop rotations substantially enhances performance. Adoption barriers remain considerable among resource-poor smallholder farmers, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where promised productivity gains have frequently fallen short of expectations. Climate-smart agriculture provides a useful policy lens for aligning tillage decisions with adaptation, mitigation, and food security objectives, but its implementation requires site-specific targeting rather than prescriptive adoption. This review calls for integrated, context-sensitive tillage strategies underpinned by long-term experimental evidence, robust life-cycle accounting, and participatory approaches that respect the constraints of diverse farming communities.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。