gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Sustainability strategies for luxury and low-cost Gulf Airlines

高級航空会社と低コスト航空会社におけるサステナビリティ戦略 (AI 翻訳)

Suhail M. Ghouse

Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-21#政策Origin: Global
DOI: 10.1108/eemcs-09-2024-0378
原典: https://doi.org/10.1108/eemcs-09-2024-0378

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本ケースは、ドバイの中堅航空会社ガルフ・エアウェイズが直面するサステナビリティ戦略のジレンマを描く。CORSIAやEUフィット・フォー・55、UAEネットゼロ2050などの規制強化の下、高級航空会社と低コスト航空会社の中間的な立場にある同社が、積極的リーダーシップ、段階的適応、最小限のコンプライアンスという3つの選択肢を評価する。受講者は、規制圧力と財務的制約の下での戦略的トレードオフを分析できる。

English

This case examines the sustainability strategy dilemma of Gulf Airways, a mid-sized UAE airline, under tightening regulations (CORSIA, EU Fit for 55, UAE Net Zero 2050). Positioned between luxury and low-cost carriers, it evaluates three pathways: aggressive leadership, phased adoption, and minimum compliance. Participants analyze trade-offs between financial resilience, regulatory credibility, and competitive positioning.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、航空業界の脱炭素化(SAF普及、CORSIA対応)が急務。本ケースは、中堅航空会社が規制と財務制約の中でどう戦略を立てるか示唆を与え、日本企業のカーボンプライシングやトランジション戦略立案に応用可能。

In the global GX context

Globally, aviation decarbonization is a critical GX challenge. This case illustrates how mid-sized airlines navigate between capital-intensive luxury carriers and efficiency-driven low-cost carriers, reflecting real tensions in the industry. It directly engages with regulatory frameworks like CORSIA and EU Fit for 55, making it relevant for strategy and policy discussions.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Illustrates application of institutional and resource-based frameworks to sustainability strategy in aviation.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a structured framework for evaluating sustainability pathways under regulatory and financial constraints.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights how regulatory design (e.g., CORSIA, Fit for 55) creates strategic ambiguity for firms.

📄 Abstract(原文)

By working through this case, participants will be able to analyse how regulatory frameworks, institutional pressures and post-pandemic constraints shape sustainability strategy in the global aviation industry; evaluate the trade-offs between cost, operational complexity and reputational legitimacy across alternative sustainability pathways for a mid-sized airline; use established strategy and sustainability frameworks (e.g. resource-based analysis, institutional analysis, stakeholder mapping) to evaluate alternative sustainability pathways and their competitive implications; and formulate and justify a coherent sustainability roadmap that balances financial resilience with long-term regulatory compliance and market credibility. These objectives form the foundation for the teaching plan (Section 7) and are directly assessed through the assignment questions (Section 8). Set in Dubai in April 2024, this case examines the strategic sustainability dilemma faced by Ahmed Al Mansoori, sustainability director at Gulf Airways, a mid-sized UAE-based airline operating in an increasingly decarbonising global aviation industry. As environmental scrutiny intensifies, Gulf Airways found itself positioned between state-backed luxury carriers with deep financial resources and agile low-cost carriers (LCCs) built on extreme operational efficiency. The case unfolds against a backdrop of tightening international and regional regulations, including International Civil Aviation Organisation’s Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation, the European Union’s “Fit for 55” package and the UAE’s Net Zero 2050 agenda. These developments have transformed sustainability from a reputational concern into a strategic requirement tied to regulatory compliance, market access and investor confidence. At the same time, the lingering financial aftershocks of the COVID-19 pandemic continued to constrain capital availability, heightening the risks associated with large-scale green investments. Drawing on industry benchmarks, regulatory developments and comparative evidence from high-cost carriers and LCCs, the case highlights the strategic ambiguity confronting Gulf Airways. Luxury carriers pursued capital-intensive sustainability leadership, while low-cost airlines embed environmental gains into efficiency-driven models. Gulf Airways, lacking both sovereign-backed scale and ultra-lean cost structures, must chart a pathway that balances financial resilience with visible progress on sustainability. After extensive analysis, Mansoori distilled the airline’s options into three strategic pathways: aggressive sustainability leadership, phased and adaptive adoption and minimum compliance. Each pathway presented distinct trade-offs in capital intensity, operational complexity, reputational positioning and competitive implications. As the executive board convenes, the decision remained unresolved. The case culminates in a strategic decision: whether Gulf Airways should commit to aggressive sustainability leadership, adopt a phased and adaptive pathway or limit itself to minimum compliance. Each option carries distinct implications for financial resilience, regulatory credibility and long-term competitive positioning. This case is designed for Master of Business Administration-level courses in strategic management, corporate sustainability, business strategy in emerging markets and transport or aviation strategy. It is particularly suitable for participants who have prior exposure to competitive strategy, stakeholder analysis and sustainability frameworks. CSS 11: Strategy.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。