Beyond watts and wheels: Mapping equity and justice in energy and mobility transitions research
ワットと車輪を超えて：エネルギーとモビリティの移行研究における公平性と正義のマッピング (AI 翻訳)
Daniel Gerdes, Fiona Lilith Medea de Fontana, Mathias Kirchner, Jana Plöchl, Patrick Scherhaufer, Nathalie Spittler, Michael Klingler
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、エネルギーとモビリティ分野における公正な移行に関する研究を体系化。481本の論文を分析し、分配・手続き・認識の正義に偏った概念の狭さ、知識生産の地理的不均衡、技術中心的枠組みの問題を指摘。新たにSHIFTフレームワークを提案する。
English
This systematic review analyzes 481 articles on justice in energy and mobility transitions (2003-2022). It finds conceptual narrowness (dominance of distributive, procedural, and recognition justice), geographical asymmetry (Global North bias), and technocratic framings that sideline power conflicts. It proposes the SHIFT framework for more inclusive low-carbon transitions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、エネルギー転換（特に再生可能エネルギー導入や水素社会）に伴う地域間格差や社会的受容性が課題。本論文のSHIFTフレームワークは、公正な移行を評価する視点を提供し、日本のGX政策における包摂的なアプローチに示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, just transition is gaining traction as a key principle in climate policy. This paper's cross-sectoral analysis and SHIFT framework address fragmentation in justice scholarship, offering a holistic lens for policymakers and researchers working on inclusive decarbonization.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This paper offers a comprehensive mapping of energy and mobility justice literature and introduces the SHIFT framework, useful for situating future research on equitable transitions.
🏢実務担当者:The findings can inform corporate sustainability teams on integrating justice considerations into their energy and mobility transition strategies, especially regarding community engagement.
🏛政策担当者:The paper highlights gaps in current justice frameworks and provides a tool for designing more inclusive transition policies that address procedural and distributional equity.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Achieving low-carbon and resilient futures requires rapid transitions in high-emitting sectors such as energy and mobility. Yet these transitions raise significant equity and justice challenges, as policies risk reproducing and exacerbating existing inequalities. Despite shared concerns over affordability, accessibility, and exposure to harm, scholarship on energy and mobility justice remains fragmented and sector-specific. This review presents a systematic, cross-sectoral analysis of justice-oriented scholarship across both domains, analyzing 481 peer-reviewed articles published between 2003–2022. Bibliometric and thematic analyses reveal three dominant patterns: (i) conceptual narrowness, with distributive, procedural, and recognition-based dimensions prevailing; (ii) asymmetry in the geography of knowledge production, driven by a small number of central knowledge brokers predominantly affiliated in the Global North; and (iii) institutional and technocratic framings that marginalize power-laden externalities and conflicts. As a synthesis, we introduce the Spatio-temporal, Holistic, and Inclusive Framework for Transition (SHIFT) to advance pluralistic, intersectional, and context-sensitive low-carbon justice agendas.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104830first seen 2026-07-13 04:51:32
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。