Comparing Green Bonds and Green Sukuk: Financial Performance, Sustainability Alignment, and Institutional Governance
グリーンボンドとグリーンスクークの比較:財務パフォーマンス、サステナビリティへの整合性、制度ガバナンス (AI 翻訳)
Salil Seth, Lokesh Tomar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
グリーンボンドとグリーンスクークを財務パフォーマンス、サステナビリティ、ガバナンスの観点から比較したレビュー。グリーンボンドは環境影響の定量分析が進んでいるが財務リターンは不明確。グリーンスクークはシャリーア原則に基づく倫理的基盤が強いが実証研究が不足。制度の質と透明性が重要と指摘。
English
A comparative review of green bonds and green sukuk across financial performance, sustainability alignment, and governance. Green bonds have more quantitative environmental impact analysis but inconclusive financial returns; green sukuk have strong ethical foundations but lack empirical studies. Institutional quality and transparency are key to credibility.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではグリーンボンド市場が拡大中であり、グリーンスクークの概念は限定的だが、本論文は持続可能な金融商品のガバナンスと信用性向上に示唆を与える。日本の金融機関や規制当局は、制度設計の重要性を再認識できる。
In the global GX context
This paper informs global sustainable finance discourse by integrating Islamic and conventional instruments, highlighting that governance ecosystems matter more than instrument type. Relevant for ISSB and transition finance frameworks that seek credible sustainability-linked instruments.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Highlights the need for empirical studies on green sukuk financial performance and comparative governance analysis across instruments.
🏢実務担当者:Useful for structuring sustainable finance products with strong governance and transparency to enhance credibility.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes that regulatory quality and institutional frameworks are critical for the credibility of green bonds and sukuk.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Purpose: The growing imperative of the climate transition has increased the use of capital markets to create sustainable finance. Green bonds and green sukuk have become important tools for financing environmentally oriented projects in conventional and Islamic financial markets. However, there is a lack of comparative synthesis between them in terms of financial, environmental, and governance aspects. The purpose of the study is to conduct a structured comparative analysis of green bonds and green sukuk in terms of financial performance, sustainability alignment, and governance architecture. Design/Methodology/Approach: This paper presents a structured comparative narrative review of peer-reviewed literature to analyze green bonds and green sukuk using financial performance, sustainability alignment, and governance architecture. The study is based on peer-reviewed journal articles published after 2015, selected from academic databases using relevant keywords. Findings: Green bonds are supported by more quantitative analysis, particularly on environmental impact, while evidence on financial returns remains inconclusive. Green sukuk have a strong ethical base grounded in Sharia principles but lack empirical financial studies. Institutional quality, regulatory practices, and transparency emerge as key factors influencing credibility and sustainability. Governance ecosystems influence sustainability outcomes more than instrument design. Implications/Originality/Value: This paper contributes by shifting the focus from structural differences to institutional effectiveness, integrating conventional and Islamic green finance. The findings are relevant for policymakers, regulators, and researchers aiming to strengthen governance and enhance the credibility of sustainable financial instruments.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v12i1.3672first seen 2026-07-01 05:46:30
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。