gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

A comparative approach to assess the embodied and operational energy of waste-based masonry materials

廃棄物ベースの組積材の体積エネルギーと運用エネルギーを評価する比較アプローチ (AI 翻訳)

D. Thoradeniya, C. Jayasinghe, I. E. Ariyaratne

Building Engineering📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-15#省エネ経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: construction
DOI: 10.59400/be4126
原典: https://doi.org/10.59400/be4126

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、廃棄物由来の組積材(AACブロック、EPSブロック)と従来のセメント砂ブロックを比較し、製造時の体積エネルギーと熱帯気候における運用エネルギーを評価した。実作業調査と熱シミュレーションを用い、AACとEPSは壁面積1m²あたりの体積エネルギーが32〜34%高いが、年間運用エネルギーはそれぞれ16%、22%低く、冷房用電力削減率は37%、52%に達した。ライフサイクル全体での正味エネルギー削減が確認され、循環型経済の促進に資する材料であることが示された。

English

This study compares waste-based masonry materials (AAC and EPS blocks) with conventional cement-sand blocks in terms of embodied energy (via process-based analysis with on-site work studies) and operational energy (via thermal simulations for a tropical residential unit). Results show 32-34% higher embodied energy per m2 for waste-based walls, but 16-22% lower annual operational energy and 37-52% cooling electricity savings, indicating net energy savings over the building lifespan and supporting circular economy principles.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、建築物のライフサイクル炭素評価が注目されており、本論文の体積エネルギーと運用エネルギーのトレードオフ分析は、日本のZEB(ネット・ゼロ・エネルギー・ビル)政策や建築物省エネ法の議論に参考となる。特に、廃棄物由来材料の活用は、日本のサーキュラーエコノミー戦略とも親和性が高い。

In the global GX context

Globally, this paper contributes empirical data on embodied and operational energy for waste-based masonry in tropical climates, relevant to green building certifications (e.g., LEED, BREEAM) and embodied carbon regulations (e.g., France's RE2020). It highlights the need to consider full life-cycle energy, not just operational phase, in building codes.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides empirical embodied energy data via work studies and thermal simulation methodology for building materials in tropical climates.

🏢実務担当者:Shows that waste-based AAC and EPS blocks can reduce cooling electricity by 37-52%, offering a business case for sustainable material selection.

🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates the life-cycle energy benefits of waste-based materials, supporting policies that incentivize circular construction and embodied energy reduction.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The construction industry has been recognised as a major contributor to several environmental challenges, mainly due to rapid urbanisation and economic growth that have driven a substantial increase in housing demand. This demand has heavily relied on energy-intensive masonry materials, including cement-sand blocks and fired clay bricks, typically manufactured using depleting natural resources. Consequently, industrial growth often accompanies economic development, resulting in vast quantities of waste, much of which is disposed of in landfills, further exacerbating environmental concerns. In this context, waste-based alternative masonry, including autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) blocks and expanded polystyrene (EPS) blocks, repurposes industrial waste into building materials, yet lacks empirical energy performance data in tropical climates. This study evaluated and compared them against cement-sand blocks using process-based analysis with work studies conducted at operating manufacturing facilities to evaluate embodied energy. It also employed thermal simulations for a representative middle-income residential unit in Sri Lanka, utilising empirically measured thermal properties of the materials, to compare the operational energy. AAC and EPS walls showed 32–34% higher embodied energy per 1 m2 of wall, but yielded 16% and 22% lower annual operational energy, respectively, with annual cooling electricity savings of 37% and 52%. Although the waste-based masonry materials exhibited a higher embodied energy than the conventional reference, the operational energy reductions observed demonstrated clear potential for net savings of energy throughout the lifespan of the buildings. Therefore, waste-based masonry units emerged as viable solutions to reduce total energy consumption in tropical climates and promote circular economy principles.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。