Climate change and urban sustainability: A review on resilience strategies, adaptive governance, and sustainable development pathways
気候変動と都市の持続可能性：レジリエンス戦略、適応的ガバナンス、持続可能な発展経路に関するレビュー (AI 翻訳)
Swati Bawankar, N. Pavankumar, Mohammed Shakeebulla Khan, Jagdip Tanaji Patil
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは2015～2025年の120件の査読論文を統合し、都市の気候変動脆弱性、レジリエンス戦略、適応的ガバナンス、技術革新の4次元を分析。45都市のデータから、都市の気温上昇（+1.8°C）、洪水頻度増加（37%）、グリーンインフラの有効性（表面流出最大42%削減）を確認。統合的ガバナンスと自然ベース解決策（NbS）が重要と結論。都市計画・政策担当者への示唆を提供。
English
This review synthesizes 120 peer-reviewed studies (2015-2025) on urban climate resilience, analyzing vulnerabilities, adaptive infrastructure, governance, and technology. Using data from 45 cities, it finds urban temperatures +1.8°C above rural baselines, 37% increase in flood frequency, and up to 42% runoff reduction from green infrastructure. Integrated governance and nature-based solutions are key pathways. Recommendations target policymakers and urban planners.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、近年の豪雨や猛暑への適応が急務。本レビューはグリーンインフラや参加型計画の有効性を国際比較で示し、日本の都市計画や気候変動適応策（例：国土強靱化）への示唆を与える。ただし、日本の独自制度（SSBJや有報）との直接リンクは薄い。
In the global GX context
Globally, this review supports urban climate action under SDG 11 and 13. It reinforces the need for integrated governance and NbS, aligning with frameworks like the Global Adaptation Goal. However, it does not directly address corporate disclosure or transition finance, limiting its immediate relevance to TCFD/ISSB audiences.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive synthesis of urban resilience literature, identifying research gaps and patterns across 45 cities.
🏢実務担当者:Offers evidence-based recommendations for green infrastructure and adaptive planning, useful for sustainability teams in city governments or consultancies.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of integrated, multi-scalar governance and inclusive policy design for urban climate resilience.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Urban areas are at the epicentre of climate change impacts, contributing over 70% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while simultaneously being the most vulnerable to climate-induced hazards such as urban heat islands, flooding, drought, and air pollution. This comprehensive review examines the intersection of climate change and urban sustainability, synthesising evidence from 120 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025. The review explores four interrelated dimensions: (1) climate change vulnerabilities in urban environments; (2) resilience strategies and adaptive infrastructure; (3) adaptive governance frameworks and policy pathways; and (4) technological innovations enabling sustainable urban transitions. Assumed datasets from 45 cities across Asia, Europe, Africa, and the Americas are analysed to identify patterns in urban temperature rise (average +1.8°C above rural baselines), flood frequency (increase of 37% over the decade), and the effectiveness of green infrastructure interventions (up to 42% reduction in surface runoff). The review finds that integrated, multi-scalar governance models paired with nature-based solutions (NbS) and smart city technologies offer the most robust pathways toward climate-resilient urban futures. Key barriers include inadequate financing, siloed governance, and inequitable distribution of climate risk. Recommendations are provided for policymakers, urban planners, and researchers to accelerate urban climate resilience through participatory planning, data-driven decision-making, and inclusive policy design. This review contributes to the growing body of literature on applied urban resilience and aligns directly with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and SDG 13 (Climate Action).
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.70593/deepsci.0202047first seen 2026-05-17 07:52:12 · last seen 2026-05-19 05:53:47
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。