Eni's Delta-Climate Methodology: A Formal Process to Verify the Consistency of Design Bases with Quantitative Prospective Climate Data
Eniのデルタクライメイト手法:設計根拠と定量的将来気候データの整合性を検証する正式プロセス (AI 翻訳)
Massimo Gagliardi, A. Di Lullo, Donatella Stocchi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、Eniが開発したデルタクライメイト手法を紹介する。この手法は、産業資産の気候変動に対するレジリエンスを評価するため、設計基準と将来の気候条件の整合性を定量的に検証する。自然災害ごとに許容しきい値を設定し、資産をスクリーニングして資産保全プロセスに組み込む。CSRD開示や金融機関の投資判断にも貢献する。
English
This paper presents Eni's Delta-Climate methodology, which assesses the resilience of industrial assets to climate change by quantitatively verifying the consistency of design bases with projected future climate conditions. It sets tolerance thresholds for various natural hazards, screens assets for critical issues, and feeds into asset integrity processes. The methodology supports CSRD disclosure and financial institutions' investment criteria.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも、TCFD/SSBJに基づく物理リスク評価が求められている。本手法は、設計基準と将来気候データの整合性を検証する実務的なアプローチを提供し、日本のエネルギー企業やインフラ事業者にとって参考になる。また、CSRD対応にも活用可能で、グローバルな開示基準との連携が期待される。
In the global GX context
This methodology directly addresses TCFD and CSRD requirements for physical climate risk assessment and disclosure. It provides a practical, top-down screening approach that integrates engineering and asset management, making it relevant for global companies facing climate adaptation. The focus on portfolio-level analysis and use of climate intelligence data providers aligns with evolving best practices in climate risk management.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured, quantitative method for climate physical risk assessment that can be adapted or compared to other approaches.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a concrete framework for assessing asset resilience to climate change, useful for corporate sustainability and risk teams, especially those preparing for CSRD or TCFD disclosure.
🏛政策担当者:Illustrates a corporate approach to climate risk that could inform regulatory guidelines on physical risk assessment and disclosure.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The increase in the frequency and intensity of natural events related to climate change implies that in the medium/long term industrial assets might be operating under more severe conditions, with a possible increase in operating risks (Physical Risk). This paper describes the approach developed by Eni to assess the resilience of its assets to climate change, by verifying the consistency of the design bases with the new expected medium/long-term conditions. Based on quantitative prospective data, Eni has developed the "Delta-Climate" methodology that analyses the quantitative variations between current and future conditions and verifies the adequacy of the design criteria, considering that the historical conditions have been properly accounted for in the design, construction and operating phases. The model considers specific tolerance thresholds for each natural event and for each type of asset, both in absolute and percentage terms, to consider best design and operating practices. Assets potentially operating in the future under climate conditions outside of the reference thresholds are highlighted, to be further investigated within the Asset Integrity processes. The "Delta-Climate" methodology allows the integrated energy company Eni to assess the Physical Risk of its entire portfolio of industrial assets promptly highlighting assets with potential critical climate issues, also quickly allowing to re-analyze all the assets when climate forecasting models are updated to reflect scientific advancements. The application of the "Delta-Climate" methodology relies on a Climate Intelligence Data Provider capable to guarantee worldwide coverage (onshore, offshore); metrics for acute and chronic climate-related natural events; medium/long-term time horizons; different socio-economic emission scenarios and statistical return periods; and the possibility to develop custom metrics. This method is an improvement of the top-down screening approach, since it fosters the full involvement of both technical engineering functions and Asset Managers, at Headquarter and Business Units levels. It guarantees that up-to-date knowledge about the plants is used, and supports the Asset Managers, who bear the responsibility to address potential criticalities emerged from the analysis. The winning factors of this approach are: speed and pervasiveness of the analyses; strengthened cooperation between technical departments, Asset Managers and the Risk Management departments; direct input into the Asset Integrity process, with support to engineering for the definition of the design bases and to Asset Managers for the identification of mitigation actions and adaptation plans; strengthening of the mandatory CSRD disclosure; appreciation by financial institutions to support their sustainability investment criteria.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.2118/233326-msfirst seen 2026-07-07 05:16:43
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。