Is Geopolitical Risk Truly Harmful to Sustainable Development? The Role of the Clean Energy Transition
地政学的リスクは本当に持続可能な開発に有害なのか？クリーンエネルギー移行の役割 (AI 翻訳)
Chunlin Xin, Irfan Khan, Hamid Hassan, Muhammad Wasif Zafar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
1995～2021年の17新興国データを用いて、地政学的リスク、天然資源消費、クリーンエネルギー移行が持続可能な開発に与える影響を分析。金融発展とエネルギー移行は持続可能性を向上させる一方、地政学的リスクは投資安定性とクリーンエネルギー展開を弱め、持続可能性を低下させる。天然資源消費は非線形効果を示し、適度な利用では開発を促進するが、過度な依存は有害。
English
Using panel data from 17 emerging economies (1995-2021), this study examines how geopolitical risk, natural resource consumption, and clean energy transition affect sustainable development. Financial development and energy transition improve sustainability, while geopolitical risk consistently reduces it by weakening investment and clean energy deployment. Natural resource consumption has nonlinear effects, supporting development at moderate levels but hindering it under excessive dependence.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX政策において、地政学リスクがエネルギー移行投資に与える影響を考慮する必要性を示唆。新興国の事例から、資源依存と地政学リスクが持続可能性に与える非線形効果を学ぶことができる。
In the global GX context
This paper adds to global GX discourse by empirically linking geopolitical risk to clean energy transition outcomes in emerging economies. It highlights the need for integrated policies that address both resource management and geopolitical stability to ensure sustainable energy transitions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a nonlinear framework linking geopolitical risk, resource dependence, and energy transition, useful for further studies on emerging economies.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes that mitigating geopolitical risk and accelerating clean energy investment are crucial for achieving sustainable development in emerging economies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT This study examines the joint effects of geopolitical risk, natural resource consumption, and the clean energy transition on sustainable development in 17 emerging economies from 1995 to 2021. Using second‐generation panel techniques, quantile regression, Driscoll–Kraay estimation, and Kernel Regularized Least Squares, the analysis captures cross‐country heterogeneity and nonlinear relationships. The findings show that financial development and energy transition significantly improve the Sustainable Development, while geopolitical risk consistently reduces sustainability outcomes by weakening investment stability and clean‐energy deployment. Natural resource consumption exhibits nonlinear effects, supporting development at moderate levels but hindering sustainability under excessive dependence. These results highlight the importance of strengthening financial systems, accelerating renewable energy investment, and implementing geopolitical risk‐mitigation strategies to achieve long‐term sustainable development. The study contributes by providing an integrated nonlinear framework linking geopolitical risk, resource dependence, and energy transition in emerging economies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71009first seen 2026-05-17 06:54:08
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。