Risk Without Values: Including Indigenous Perspectives in Climate Risk Assessments
価値を欠くリスク：気候リスク評価への先住民族の視点の組み込み (AI 翻訳)
Marcelle Scadden, George W Warren, Darcy Glenn, Lily George, Tom M. Logan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、CDPに提出された都市の気候リスク評価（CRA）をレビューし、先住民族の視点が技術官僚的枠組みに取り込まれ、リスク概念形成に反映されていないことを指摘。真の包摂には、関係性や場所に根ざした先住民族のリスク理解を組み込んだ枠組みが必要と論じる。
English
This paper reviews climate risk assessments (CRAs) submitted to CDP by international cities, finding that while Indigenous exposure is acknowledged, their perspectives and values are often subsumed within dominant technocratic frameworks. The authors argue for risk frameworks capable of accommodating relational, place-based Indigenous understandings.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の気候リスク評価（自治体の事業継続計画や適応計画）においても、アイヌ民族などの先住民族の視点が軽視される傾向にある。本論文は、形式的な包摂ではなく、枠組みそのものの再考の必要性を示唆しており、日本の自治体の気候変動適応策に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper critiques the superficial inclusion of Indigenous perspectives in climate risk assessments under CDP, which parallels global challenges in incorporating diverse knowledge systems into standardized disclosure frameworks like TCFD and ISSB. It underscores the need for climate risk frameworks to respect epistemological diversity.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:For climate risk researchers, this paper highlights the limitations of current CRA frameworks in accommodating Indigenous knowledge systems, urging methodological pluralism.
🏢実務担当者:Sustainability reporting teams should consider how their CRAs engage with Indigenous communities, moving beyond acknowledgment to structural inclusion.
🏛政策担当者:Regulators developing climate risk disclosure standards should design frameworks that allow for place-based, relational risk understandings, not just technocratic metrics.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Climate risk assessments (CRAs) increasingly acknowledge Indigenous communities as disproportionately exposed to climate change, yet they rarely engage Indigenous perspectives as distinct ways of understanding risk. In a thematic review of CRAs self‐submitted to the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) by English‐speaking international cities, we examined how Indigenous perspectives, values, and worldviews are represented. Although many reports recognized unequal exposure, few addressed the structural sources of inequity or differences in how risk, consequence, and adaptation are conceptualized. Indigenous knowledge and sociocultural dimensions were typically incorporated within prevailing technocratic frameworks rather than recognized as alternative risk framings. As a result, Indigenous perspectives were translated into dominant institutional paradigms instead of shaping the conceptual foundations of assessment itself. These findings suggest that procedural inclusion is insufficient. Meaningful engagement requires climate risk frameworks capable of accommodating relational, place‐based, and Indigenous understandings of risk, rather than subsuming them within existing models.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70309first seen 2026-07-15 05:49:31
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。