REDD+ Application in Southeast Asia: Legal Challenges and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Climate Change Mitigation
東南アジアにおけるREDD+の適用：気候変動緩和における法的課題と先住民族の権利 (AI 翻訳)
Adrian Nugraha, Joni Emirzon, Muhammad Azil Maskur, Robert Lihtorng Chen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
この研究は東南アジアにおけるREDD+適用の法的枠組みと先住民族の権利保護を批判的に検討。法律認識の格差や自由意志による事前の十分な情報に基づく同意（FPIC）の実施不足を指摘し、権利に基づくアプローチを提言する。
English
This paper examines legal challenges and indigenous peoples' rights in REDD+ application across Southeast Asia. It finds disparities in legal recognition and FPIC enforcement, and recommends rights-based approaches integrating indigenous worldviews into policymaking for effective climate mitigation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は森林炭素クレジット（J-クレジット等）を推進しているが、REDD+のような国際的な森林保全メカニズムとの連携や先住民族の権利保護については、法的枠組みの整備が課題である。本論文は東南アジアの事例を分析し、日本のGX政策における森林保全の位置づけや国際協力のあり方を考える示唆を提供する。
In the global GX context
This paper highlights legal gaps in REDD+ implementation across Southeast Asia, offering lessons for global carbon offset frameworks like Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. It underscores the importance of free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) and indigenous rights for equitable climate mitigation, relevant to international disclosure and standards.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative legal analysis of REDD+ safeguards across Southeast Asia, useful for scholars studying carbon offset governance.
🏢実務担当者:Can inform corporate forest carbon project developers on the legal and rights-related risks in Southeast Asian countries.
🏛政策担当者:Offers policy recommendations for aligning REDD+ with indigenous rights, relevant for national climate legislation and international negotiations.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Indigenous peoples, whose cultural and ecological connections to forests are profound, are disproportionately affected by climate change and related mitigation initiatives, including REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation). This study critically examines the protection of Indigenous peoples’ rights in REDD+ application across Southeast Asia, with particular attention to disparities in legal recognition, stakeholder engagement, and the application of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC). Employing a doctrinal legal research methodology, the analysis draws on primary sources—such as international treaties, national constitutions, statutory regulations, and REDD+ strategies—and secondary sources, including UN and FAO reports, to evaluate both legal frameworks and practical safeguards. The findings indicate that while some countries (e.g., Indonesia, the Philippines, Cambodia, and Myanmar) formally recognize Indigenous peoples, participation mechanisms and FPIC enforcement remain limited; others (e.g., Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Laos) lack explicit recognition, leaving significant gaps in rights protection. The study concludes that effective REDD+ application requires harmonized treaty interactions, strengthened domestic safeguards, and the integration of Indigenous worldviews into policymaking. It recommends inclusive, rights-based approaches that position Indigenous communities as active partners, promoting both ecological sustainability and social justice.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.15294/ildisea.v5i1.36056first seen 2026-07-04 04:37:35
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。