Green Finance Transformation and Intellectual Growth: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis of Thematic Evolution and Geographic Research Disparities (2015–2026)
Janah Nada, El Ganich Said, Yahyaoui Taoufiq, Kouchrad Ikhlass
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
2015～2026年のグリーンファイナンス研究を対象とした文献計量分析。Web of Scienceからデータを抽出し、PRISMAガイドラインに従って分析。テーマの変遷、引用構造、地理的不均衡（Global North偏重、アフリカ・中南米・中東北アフリカの過小評価）を明らかにした。ESG規制枠組みの影響が強まる一方、デジタルファイナンスやAIの統合は限定的。
English
A systematic bibliometric review of green finance research from 2015-2026, using Web of Science and PRISMA guidelines. Findings reveal increasing publications since 2019, thematic clusters around sustainability transitions and digital finance, and pronounced geographic imbalance favoring the Global North. Limited integration of AI and digital finance is noted.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はグリーンファイナンス研究で一定の存在感を示すが、本分析はアジア域内での役割やSSBJとの連動をさらに強化する余地を示唆。国内のGX実践に資するメカニズムベースの研究が不足している点を認識すべき。
In the global GX context
This study highlights the uneven global landscape of green finance research, with implications for international ESG frameworks like ISSB and CSRD. The underrepresentation of the Global South calls for more inclusive data and policy coordination in transition finance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Identifies thematic clusters and gaps in green finance literature, offering a bibliometric foundation for future research directions.
🏢実務担当者:Useful for understanding key research trends and regulatory influences shaping green finance products and ESG integration.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights geographic disparities that may inform international cooperation and capacity-building in green finance standards.
📄 Abstract（原文）
In this research, the primary aim is to conduct a systematic review of the thematic evolution of green finance, which remains fragmented and unevenly represented in global academic debates. The objective of this analysis is to scientifically map out the scholarly output on green finance from 2015 to 2026, detailing its intellectual structure, trends, thematic clusters, and emerging lacunae in the field. Primary data extraction from Web of Science was employed to construct the bibliometric database, whereas the identification, screening, and selection of the final dataset were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to ensure the study’s transparency and reliability. The main findings highlighted an increasing scholarly interest in the field’s publications from 2019 onward. Key occurrences and citation maps, using RStudio (version 4.1) and Biblioshiny (version 4.5.2), indicate dispersed clusters comprising sustainability transitions, digital finance, bibliometric methods, and a weak link to governance and behavioral perspectives. The co-authorship and country analyses confirm a pronounced geographic imbalance of green finance-related research in academia, with an overrepresentation in the Global North and an underrepresentation in Africa, Latin America, and the MENA region. The analysis further emphasizes the growing role of institutional and ESG regulatory frameworks in shaping research trajectories, while also identifying a limited integration of emerging technological dimensions such as digital finance and artificial intelligence. Thus, the study’s contribution to the literature relies on its critical understanding and structuring of the field’s evolution. The implications include synthesizing research gaps and the need for outcome-oriented impact assessments and mechanism-based models of green finance to ensure significant inclusivity and resilience in the subject’s future agenda.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19050368first seen 2026-05-23 06:00:14 · last seen 2026-05-27 05:07:12
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。