gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

How can trade unions act strategically in response to decarbonisation? Union strategic capacity and automotive transition policies in Germany, Spain and the UK

脱炭素化に戦略的に対応するには? ドイツ、スペイン、英国における労働組合の戦略的能力と自動車移行政策 (AI 翻訳)

Benjamin Crawford, Marion Dumas, Fergus Green, Xaquín García, Katja Treichel-Grass

Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-19#政策Origin: EU
DOI: 10.1177/10242589261444001
原典: https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589261444001
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、内燃機関の段階的廃止政策に直面した労働組合の戦略的能力を、ドイツ・スペイン・英国の事例から分析する。組合が気候・産業政策に同時に対応し、多国籍企業やサプライチェーンに影響を与える能力の重要性を指摘。従来の団体交渉を超えた新たな能力構築の必要性を明らかにする。

English

This paper analyzes trade unions' strategic capacity in response to internal combustion engine phase-out policies, based on case studies in Germany, Spain, and the UK. It highlights how unions must simultaneously address climate, industrial, and supply chain issues, requiring capacity building beyond traditional collective bargaining.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では自動車産業のEVシフトが進むが、労働組合の戦略的関与に関する研究は限られる。本論文の欧州事例は、日本の組合や政策担当者にとって、公正な移行(just transition)を実現するための示唆を提供する。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to the global just transition literature by empirically examining how unions build strategic capacity to influence automotive decarbonization policies. It offers insights for policymakers and stakeholders involved in designing inclusive climate policies and managing supply chain transitions.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Scholars studying just transition, union strategy, and industrial policy can use this framework to analyze union capacity in other contexts.

🏢実務担当者:Trade unions and automotive companies can learn about strategic approaches to engage with decarbonization policies and supply chain dynamics.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should note the importance of building union capacity to ensure inclusive and effective transition policies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Climate policy measures and the energy transition present challenges for unions beyond the traditional scope of collective bargaining and social dialogue. Union responses to policies to phase out internal combustion engines must simultaneously address climate, environmental and industrial policy issues, and influence decision-making within multinational corporations and the web of supply chain firms that participate in production. Studies point to the need for capacity building to enable unions to respond to these complex challenges. Nevertheless, the nature of the union ‘capacity’ to be mobilised in climate responses, and how this is developing in diverse institutional contexts, remains unclear. Building on Richard Hyman’s concept of ‘strategic capacity’, the article explores how different dimensions of union capacity are mobilised to respond to challenges posed by internal combustion engine phase-out policies. This article draws on a study that maps trade unions’ responses to such policies in the United Kingdom and two EU countries.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。