Decarbonizing Composites: Policy‐Oriented Review of Carbon Footprint, Circularity, and Carbon Trading
複合材料の脱炭素化：カーボンフットプリント、循環性、炭素取引に関する政策指向レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Chan Kok Lee, Hooi Ren Lim, Doris Ying Ying Tang, Pau Loke Show, Kit Wayne Chew
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、複合材料の持続可能性と炭素ガバナンス（炭素税、排出権取引、自主的炭素市場）の接点を検討する。ライフサイクル評価と循環性の重要性を指摘し、複合材料の炭素クレジット適格性は限定的であると結論づける。建設分野におけるバイオベース・カーボンニュートラル材料への移行を後押しする内容。
English
This policy-oriented review examines how sustainable composite materials intersect with carbon governance mechanisms, including carbon taxes, emissions trading, and voluntary carbon markets. It evaluates life cycle assessment, circularity, and end-of-life pathways, concluding that tradable carbon credits for composites remain limited. The paper supports the shift toward bio-based, circular, and carbon-neutral materials in construction.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ開示基準やカーボンプライシングの議論が進む中、本レビューは複合材料産業におけるカーボンフットプリント算定と炭素クレジット活用の課題を整理しており、企業の開示対応や調達方針に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, the review aligns with ISSB and CSRD requirements for lifecycle-based disclosure. It provides a framework for companies to navigate carbon accounting and credit eligibility in composite material value chains, relevant for transition finance and supply chain decarbonization.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This review synthesizes carbon governance mechanisms relevant to composite materials, highlighting methodological gaps for tradable carbon credits.
🏢実務担当者:Companies can use this to understand carbon accounting and circularity requirements for sustainable composites, aiding compliance with emerging disclosure rules.
🏛政策担当者:The paper clarifies how carbon taxes and ETS apply to composite materials and the limitations of carbon credits, informing policy design for construction material decarbonization.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Composite materials have been used since ancient times, notably in the form of “Cob,” where clay, earth, straw, and organic matter were combined to improve building performance. Many composite materials rely on carbon‐intensive binders, fibers, fillers, or petroleum‐derived polymer matrices, raising concerns about life cycle emissions, recyclability, and end‐of‐life management. Global climate commitments have triggered a shift toward carbon neutrality. The industry is transitioning from trend‐driven “green” claims to measurable environmental compliance. Hence, this review examines how sustainable composite materials intersect with carbon governance mechanisms, including carbon taxes, emissions trading systems, and voluntary carbon markets, as well as the differentiation of carbon‐accounting categories. The review also evaluates how life cycle assessment, circularity, and end‐of‐life pathways influence the credibility of sustainability claims. In summary, sustainable composites can support decarburization, but their eligibility for tradable carbon credit remains limited and depends on recognized methodologies, additionality, permanence, monitoring, reporting, and verification. From ancient Cob to modern concrete, composites have shaped construction. Now, the focus shifts to sustainability—where bio‐based, circular, and carbon‐neutral materials are redefining the future of building.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.70063first seen 2026-07-16 05:14:38
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。