Embodied carbon impacts of residential development siteworks: new assessment framework
住宅開発の用地整備におけるエンボディドカーボン影響:新しい評価フレームワーク (AI 翻訳)
P. Comerford, O. Kinnane, R. O’Hegarty, Philip Crowe
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
住宅建設の脱炭素化は主に運用エネルギーに焦点が当てられているが、用地整備(外構やインフラ)を含むエンボディドカーボン(EC)の評価が不足している。本研究では、建物から近隣地区までの範囲でEC評価の物理的範囲を明確に定義するフレームワークを提案。アイルランドの事例研究により、用地整備が低層住宅のEC(A1-A5)に32%追加されることを示した。このフレームワークは都市計画者や開発者に低炭素地区設計の指針を提供する。
English
A new framework for assessing embodied carbon (EC) in residential development siteworks—hard landscaping and infrastructure—adds precision to lifecycle assessment. A case study in Ireland shows siteworks contribute an additional 32% to EC for life-cycle stages A1-A5 of low-rise housing. The framework supports low-carbon district design and compact urban growth policies by enabling separate assessment of urban form elements.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、住宅建設の脱炭素化が進む中、エンボディドカーボンの評価基準が重要になっている。本フレームワークは、用地整備を含む包括的なEC評価を可能にし、日本の都市計画や住宅政策(例:省エネ基準、低炭素街区)への応用が期待される。特に、密集市街地やインフラ整備のEC評価の参考となる。
In the global GX context
This framework addresses a gap in embodied carbon accounting by including siteworks and infrastructure, which are often excluded from building-level assessments. It provides a clear method for comparing greenfield and infill developments, relevant to global urban sustainability and climate action plans. The findings support policies promoting densification and reduced upfront carbon emissions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a clear methodology for defining physical boundaries in embodied carbon assessment, enabling more consistent comparisons across studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a practical framework for developers and planners to include siteworks in carbon calculations, crucial for meeting low-carbon district targets.
🏛政策担当者:Supports evidence-based policies for compact urban growth by quantifying the carbon impact of siteworks, aiding in setting EC targets for infrastructure.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Plans to decarbonise residential construction in many countries focus mainly on reducing the operational energy of dwellings and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, rather than the full life-cycle emissions of construction. Although there is a growing body of data that measures the embodied carbon (EC) of different housing types, existing studies have mainly assessed materials within the building envelope. Where siteworks and infrastructure are included, there is often a lack of clarity regarding the physical scope of site boundaries due to the various methodologies used, making it difficult to compare results across studies. This gap is addressed by research underpinning a new framework that provides precise definitions of the physical scope of EC assessment at a range of scales from building to neighbourhood, allowing siteworks to be included in the EC calculations of new developments. A case study housing development in Ireland illustrates the framework. The results show that siteworks comprising hard landscaping and infrastructure add an additional 32% to the total EC for life-cycle stages A1–A5 of low-rise housing typologies, demonstrating the importance of the framework. By integrating siteworks into life-cycle assessment (LCA) calculations, the research highlights the relationships between building typology, residential density and EC emissions. POLICY RELEVANCE Guidance is provided for urban planners, developers and construction professionals focused on designing low carbon districts. While some countries have established EC targets for various housing types, there remains a critical lack of guidance on GHG emissions linked to constructing the broader urban environment and its supporting infrastructure. This research addresses that gap by presenting a framework that breaks down urban form into distinct elements, enabling separate assessment of their EC impacts. Using a greenfield development as a case study, the findings highlight the substantial contribution of siteworks to upfront emissions. Moreover, the framework offers a framework for comparing developments involving existing structures and infill projects integrated into established urban landscapes and infrastructures, thereby supporting policies promoting compact growth and densification within current urban footprints.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.668first seen 2026-06-29 06:38:32
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。