gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

A rapid embodied carbon assessment tool for priority materials

優先材料のための迅速な具体化炭素評価ツール (AI 翻訳)

Thomas P Hendrickson, Jibran S. Zuberi, Kaiyu Sun, Aven Satre-Meloy, Arman Shehabi, Jennifer R. Stokes-Draut, Sarah J. Smith, Peng Peng, Eric Masanet

Environmental Research Communications📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-03-12#炭素会計Origin: US経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: construction
DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/ae514a
原典: https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae514a

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、建築材料(特にカリフォルニア州のセメント・コンクリート)の具体化炭素を迅速に評価するツールREDuCEを開発した。ユーザーは生産技術、輸送手段、燃料源、地域電力構成をカスタマイズでき、低炭素生産経路や材料効率向上により最大80%の排出削減が可能である。事例研究では、材料使用強度の低減が主要な削減要因であることが示された。

English

This paper presents the REDuCE tool for rapid embodied carbon assessment of building materials, focusing on cement and concrete in California. It allows users to customize supply chains (production technology, transport, fuel, electricity mix) and explore mitigation options (low-carbon production, material efficiency, transport modes). A case study shows up to 80% emission savings, primarily from reduced material use intensity. The tool expands LCA capabilities for stakeholders to assess customized supply chains.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、建設分野のカーボンニュートラルに向けて、建材の具体化炭素評価が重要視されている。本ツールはサプライチェーンカスタマイズが可能であり、日本のサプライヤー評価やSSBJ対応に応用可能。ただし、カリフォルニア向けのため、日本の電力構成や輸送距離に調整が必要。

In the global GX context

Globally, embodied carbon assessment is increasingly mandated (e.g., ISO 14067, EN 15804). This tool offers a customizable LCA approach that could inform similar tools for other regions, including compliance with ISSB and CSRD. The focus on material efficiency and low-carbon pathways is widely applicable.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a flexible LCA tool that can be adapted for other materials and regions, with insights on mitigation levers.

🏢実務担当者:Useful for building material suppliers and construction firms to evaluate customized supply chain emissions and identify cost-effective reduction options.

🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates potential emission reduction through material efficiency and low-carbon technologies, supporting policy on embodied carbon standards.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Embodied carbon limits within building materials are a driving factor in global trade, generating new research and analysis tools in industry. These product assessments, which require utilizing life-cycle assessment (LCA) across broad supply chains, can be expensive, time and data-intensive, and subject to significant variations. Existing methods and tools, such as specific environmental product declarations, typically do not capture these variations and dynamics in supply and manufacturing. Moreover, models and tools must enable stakeholders to assess customized supply chains and future scenarios. In this study, we present the Rapid Embodied Carbon Assessment and Target-setting for Emissions-intensive Materials (REDuCE) tool for building materials. We developed a tool that allows users to select production technologies, transportation mode and distances, concrete carbonation, fuel sources, and regional electricity mixes to supply customization for cement and concrete produced and consumed in California. We generated and integrated a material demand model using residential building stock projections. We provide the user with a wide range of mitigation alternatives through low-carbon production pathways, material use efficiency, transportation modes, and projected electricity grid mixes. In a case study application through four mitigation scenarios, we find emission savings up to 80% by maximizing user mitigation alternatives, primarily driven by reductions in material use intensities. This work represents a foundation for expanding LCA and embodied carbon tools to better enable stakeholders to rapidly and accurately assess customized supply chains while meeting trade requirements.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。