gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Household coping mechanisms under grid failure: Evidence from a high electrification context in Lebanon

停電下における家計の対処メカニズム:高電化率のレバノンの事例から (AI 翻訳)

Majd Olleik, Haytham M. Dbouk, Anne Neumann, Elsa Bou Gebrael, Sebastian Zwickl-Bernhard

arXiv (Cornell University)プレプリント2026-06-16#エネルギー転換対象セクター: energy
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2606.17807
原典: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2606.17807

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

レバノンにおける慢性的な停電下での家計の対処行動を分析。1,000世帯の調査から、ディーゼル発電機から太陽光・蓄電池システムへの移行や需要抑制が観察された。社会経済的地位がバックアップ手段へのアクセスを左右し、太陽光発電の余剰など非効率も生じている。政策として、未充足需要の考慮や技術への公平なアクセス確保が重要と指摘。

English

This paper analyzes household coping mechanisms under chronic grid failure in Lebanon, using survey data from 1,000 households. It finds a shift from diesel generators to solar PV-battery systems among wealthier households, along with demand-side adaptations like load shifting. Inefficiencies such as curtailed solar generation are noted. Policy implications include addressing unmet demand and inequitable access to backup technologies.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でも高電化率地域における停電対策が重要。本論文は、ディーゼル発電機から太陽光+蓄電池への移行や需要抑制など、家計レベルの対処行動を定量的に示しており、日本の分散型エネルギー推進や災害時のレジリエンス向上に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This paper provides empirical evidence on household coping strategies in a high-electrification setting with chronic grid failure, highlighting the role of solar PV-battery systems and demand-side adjustments. It informs global debates on energy access, resilience, and the efficiency of decentralized renewables in supply-constrained contexts.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Offers a quantitative framework for analyzing household adaptation to unreliable electricity supply, with implications for energy planning and demand modeling.

🏢実務担当者:Provides insights for energy companies and utilities on customer behavior and the potential for distributed solar plus storage in backup markets.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need to account for unmet demand and address inequities in access to backup technologies, relevant for energy resilience and climate adaptation policy.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Despite near-universal electrification in many countries, electricity supply shortages continue to shape household energy use. This paper examines how households adapt to chronic grid failure in high-electrification, high-dependence contexts, using Lebanon as a case study. Drawing on original survey data from 1,000 households, we analyze both supply-side coping mechanisms such as diesel generators and solar photovoltaic (PV)-battery systems, and demand-side adaptations, including load shifting and demand suppression. The results reveal a landscape of household responses, where socioeconomic status plays a central role in determining access to backup solutions and the extent of met demand. While diesel generators remain widespread, a transition toward PV-battery systems is observed, especially among financially capable households. However, decentralized self-generation is associated with inefficiencies, including substantial levels of curtailed solar generation. On the demand side, households exhibit reductions in electricity use, leading to distinct consumption profiles depending on the type of backup system employed. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between met and unmet demand when assessing energy needs under unreliable supply. The paper contributes to the literature by providing a quantitative characterization of the interaction between self-generation and demand adaptation in a supply-constrained high-electrification context. It also offers empirical demand profiles that incorporate suppressed consumption, addressing a key gap in electricity system planning. From a policy perspective, the results underscore the need to account for unmet demand, address inequities in access to coping technologies, and reduce inefficiencies in decentralized systems.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。