A Justice Evaluation Framework for the Participatory Planning and Implementation of Nature-Based Solutions
自然を基盤とした解決策の参加型計画と実施のための正義評価フレームワーク (AI 翻訳)
ARIANNA FELICIANI, David Camacho-Caballero, Johannes Langemeyer
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、自然を基盤とした解決策（NBS）の計画と実施における正義の統合を評価するフレームワークを開発・検証した。文献レビューとヨーロッパ6都市の実務者へのインタビューに基づき、参加プロセスにおける正義の欠如がシステム的であることを明らかにした。
English
This study develops and validates a justice evaluation framework for nature-based solutions (NBS) planning, revealing systemic justice shortcomings through literature review and interviews with practitioners from six European cities, and calls for institutional transformation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、気候変動適応策としてグリーンインフラやNBSの導入が進むが、参加型計画における正義の視点は不足している。本フレームワークは、日本の自治体や事業者がNBSプロジェクトをより公平に設計・評価するための参考となる。
In the global GX context
Globally, NBS are promoted for climate adaptation, but justice concerns are gaining attention. This framework provides a diagnostic tool for planners to improve equity in participatory processes, relevant to international urban sustainability agendas.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured justice evaluation framework that can be tested or adapted in other contexts, particularly for NBS or green infrastructure projects.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a practical diagnostic tool to identify and address justice gaps in participatory NBS planning and implementation.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights systemic justice issues in NBS projects, suggesting the need for institutional reforms to ensure equitable outcomes.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) are increasingly employed to address urban socio-ecological challenges; however, the integration of justice within their implementation remains an important concern, particularly within participatory processes. This study addresses this challenge by developing and validating an evaluation framework designed to equip planners and practitioners to diagnose justice-related shortcomings and guide the participatory planning and implementation of more equitable NBS. The research was conducted in three consecutive steps. A literature review identified recurring justice themes in participatory NBS planning processes, which informed the development of justice criteria organized around four main categories: (a) Inclusiveness and Equity, (b) Quality of the Process, (c) Governance and Power, and (d) Institutionalization and Impact. Second, these criteria were integrated into a justice model aligned with an NBS planning-cycle. Third, this model was translated into interview guidelines and tested with practitioners from six European cities: Metropolitan Area of Barcelona (Spain), Warsaw (Poland), Sarajevo (Bosnia-Herzegovina), Mannheim (Germany), Vejle (Denmark), and Thessaloniki (Greece). Findings confirm that justice limitations in NBS planning and implementation are systemic, stemming from foundational gaps in knowledge and communication that cascade into inequitable participatory processes and outcomes. The justice framework presented here uncovers a misalignment between existing practices and justice principles, resulting in short-term planning, insufficient evaluation mechanisms, and persistent power asymmetries. These factors collectively limit the ability to achieve fair and equitable results. Ultimately, the study calls for and might facilitate institutional transformations to embed justice principles into NBS planning and implementation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2026.100359first seen 2026-06-29 05:26:19 · last seen 2026-06-29 05:26:21
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。