Public perceptions of climate policy fairness and effectiveness across climate policy types and domains in 15 countries
15カ国における気候政策の公平性と有効性に関する認識：政策タイプと領域を横断して (AI 翻訳)
Ulf J.J. Hahnel, Nina L. Frings
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、15カ国（N=6,052）を対象に、気候政策の有効性と公平性に関する認識を政策タイプ・領域別に調査。グローバル・サウスの人々は、気候政策をより有効かつ公平と評価し、気候変動への脆弱性が高い国ほど認識が高く、一人当たり排出量が多い国ほど低いことが示された。心理的要因（気候変動懸念、政治的指向）の影響も国により異なる。
English
This study examines public perceptions of climate policy effectiveness and fairness across four policy types and two domains in 15 countries (N=6,052). Results show that individuals in the Global South are more optimistic and perceive policies as fairer than those in the Global North. Higher climate vulnerability correlates with higher perceived effectiveness/fairness, while higher per capita emissions correlate with lower perceptions. The influence of psychological factors varies by country context.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の政策立案において、気候政策の受容性は重要な課題である。本研究は日本を含む国際比較データを提供し、日本の排出量の高さが政策の公平性認識にどう影響するかを示唆する。これは、炭素税や排出権取引などの導入議論に資する。
In the global GX context
This cross-country study highlights the asymmetry in climate policy perceptions between the Global North and South, emphasizing the need for context-sensitive policy design. For global climate governance, it underscores that fairness and effectiveness perceptions are shaped by national vulnerability and emissions responsibility, offering insights for international negotiations and communication strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides robust cross-cultural data on how perceived fairness and effectiveness vary across policy types and national contexts, enabling further multilevel analysis.
🏢実務担当者:Useful for understanding public support for different climate policies across regions, informing stakeholder engagement and policy design.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights that policy fairness and effectiveness perceptions are context-dependent and must be addressed locally, especially in high-emission countries like Japan.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Individuals are more supportive of climate policies when they think the measures are fair and effective. This evidence, however, is primarily based on data from Western samples, leaving it open how public effectiveness and fairness perceptions vary across geographical contexts and how they are shaped by regional indicators. Here, we aim to address these questions, investigating climate policy effectiveness and fairness perceptions across four policy types and two policy domains in 15 countries, covering all continents (N=6’052). Effectiveness and fairness ratings varied between policy types and domains, and this pattern was relatively stable across nations. However, individuals in the Global South were overall more optimistic about the effectiveness of climate policies and evaluated them as generally fairer compared to the Global North. Linking psychological and contextual data further shows that effectiveness and fairness perceptions were higher in countries that are more vulnerable to climate change impacts and lower in countries with higher per capita emissions. Moreover, the impact of psychological variables such as climate change concern and political orientation on both outcomes varied as a function of national context. Taken together, our findings point to important geographical asymmetries in the extent to which the public perceives climate mitigation policies as effective and fair, shaped by how much countries contribute to and are affected by climate change.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://osf.io/w235kfirst seen 2026-07-10 05:02:43 · last seen 2026-07-10 05:28:34
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。