Sudamérica frente a las narrativas hegemónicas de los minerales críticos y la Transición Energética Corporativa
南米から見た批判的鉱物と企業のエネルギー転換をめぐるヘゲモニー的言説 (AI 翻訳)
Ana Lia Guerrero
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、南米の批判的視点から、グローバルなアクターが批判的鉱物と「企業のエネルギー転換」に関するヘゲモニー的言説をどのように争い形成するかを分析する。脱炭素化の言説の下で、企業のエネルギー転換は「緑の新植民地主義」を再生産し、化石燃料への依存を批判的鉱物への多層的依存にシフトさせ、グローバル・サウスで新たな資源収奪を深めていると論じる。南米は戦略的資源の利用と管理を再定義し、従属的な立場を克服して自らの開発優先事項に沿ったエネルギー転換を目指すべきだと提言する。
English
This paper analyzes how global actors dispute and shape hegemonic narratives around critical minerals and the corporate energy transition from a South American critical perspective. It argues that under a decarbonization discourse, the corporate energy transition reproduces a form of 'green neocolonialism,' shifting dependence from fossil fuels to a multidimensional dependence on critical minerals, deepening neo-extractivism in the Global South. South America faces the challenge of redefining the use and control of its strategic resources to orient the energy transition according to its own development priorities.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業が南米の鉱物資源に依存するサプライチェーンを有する場合、本論文が指摘する「緑の新植民地主義」批判は、ESGや人権デューデリジェンスの観点から重要な示唆を与える。ただし、日本の国内政策やSSBJに直接の関連性は薄い。
In the global GX context
This paper offers a critical perspective on the global energy transition narrative, highlighting the risk of 'green neocolonialism' in critical mineral supply chains. It is relevant for global discussions on just transition, resource governance, and corporate accountability under frameworks like the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Scholars in political ecology, energy geographies, and critical resource studies will find a fresh theoretical framing of the energy transition as neo-extractivism.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams in mining or battery supply chains should consider the reputational and governance risks raised by the 'green neocolonialism' critique.
🏛政策担当者:Regulators and international bodies working on just transition frameworks or responsible sourcing standards can draw on this South American perspective to avoid reinforcing inequalities.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This article analyzes, from a South American critical perspective, how global actors dispute and shape hegemonic narratives surrounding critical minerals and the so-called Corporate Energy Transition. Using an exploratory methodology and a mixed-methods approach that combines analysis of reports from international organizations, bibliographic review, and the author’s previous work, the study examines the geopolitical nature of these minerals within the context of the global energy transition. The findings show that, under a discourse of decarbonization, the corporate energy transition reproduces a form of “green neocolonialism,” shifting dependence from fossil fuels to a multidimensional dependence on critical minerals, thereby deepening neo-extractivism in the Global South. In this context, the article argues that South America faces the challenge of redefining the use and control of its strategic resources, overcoming subordinate positions and orienting the energy transition according to its own development priorities.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.47456/geo.v6i42.51965first seen 2026-05-23 05:04:26 · last seen 2026-05-27 04:31:17
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。