Evolving sustainability reporting and environmental performance of manufacturing companies: evidence from India
進化するサステナビリティ報告と製造企業の環境パフォーマンス:インドからの証拠 (AI 翻訳)
Swati Verma, Rajat Panwar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、インドのBRSR枠組みに基づくESG報告を分析し、大規模製造企業の温室効果ガス排出原単位の削減、再生可能エネルギー利用の増加、水・廃棄物処理の取り組みなどを明らかにした。開示規制が企業のグリーン転換を促進する効果を示す一方、報告のギャップやグリーンウォッシングのリスクも指摘されている。
English
This study analyzes ESG disclosures under India's BRSR framework for 100 large manufacturing firms. It finds reductions in emission intensity, increased renewable energy use, and adoption of water/waste treatment initiatives, while highlighting persistent reporting gaps and greenwashing risks, providing evidence that disclosure-based regulation can accelerate firm-level green transition.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJによるサステナビリティ開示基準の策定が進む中、インドのBRSRは強制開示枠組みの先行事例として参考になる。本論文は、開示規制が具体的に企業の環境パフォーマンス改善に寄与することを示しており、日本の政策担当者や実務者にとって示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
This paper offers empirical evidence from India's mandatory BRSR framework, demonstrating that disclosure regulation can drive corporate decarbonization. As global jurisdictions like the EU (CSRD) and US (SEC) implement similar rules, India's experience provides valuable lessons on both the potential and pitfalls (e.g., greenwashing) of such approaches.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical benchmarks on corporate environmental performance under mandatory ESG disclosure, useful for comparative studies on disclosure effectiveness.
🏢実務担当者:Manufacturing firms can use the findings to benchmark their own sustainability targets and reporting practices against India's largest companies.
🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence that mandatory ESG disclosure accelerates green transition, supporting policy design for similar frameworks in other countries.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The manufacturing sector has been a major contributor to annual greenhouse gas emissions in India. Yet, firm-level data on carbon emissions and environmental footprints remain limited, largely because of insufficient corporate reporting. The purpose of this study is to analyze the recently introduced, comprehensive Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) reports of India’s 100 largest publicly listed manufacturing firms for 2022–2023 to assess their evolving green transition and sustainability efforts, environmental performance and reporting quality. Drawing on the mandatory ESG disclosures under India’s Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) framework, this study evaluates key parameters reflecting firms’ environmental responsibility, awareness, performance and initiatives. Raw data were collected from the BRSR sections of annual reports of 100 large manufacturing companies, and both quantitative and qualitative data were standardized for analysis. The commitment of companies to the green transition is reflected in reductions in greenhouse gas emission intensity, increased use of renewable energy, lower energy consumption and water-use intensity and the widespread adoption of water and waste treatment initiatives. Several firms have set targets for emissions reduction and renewable energy use, while also increasing R&D and capital expenditures related to ESG priorities. Many companies have strengthened their ESG performance and reporting practices, implemented ESG impact assessment initiatives and improved regulatory compliance. Although the uptake of environmental sustainability reporting among large manufacturing firms appears encouraging, significant reporting gaps and risks of greenwashing persist, warranting careful policy attention. This study indicates that the adoption of the BRSR framework in India has encouraged large manufacturing firms to align with stricter sustainability standards, with important policy implications. The findings of this study provide evidence that disclosure-based regulation can meaningfully accelerate green transition at the firm level. This study is limited to a sample of 100 large manufacturing companies. Accordingly, the findings, conclusions and research implications are primarily applicable to large manufacturing firms and may not be generalizable across other firm sizes or sectors. In addition, the set of environmental indicators analyzed is restricted to those mandated under the BRSR disclosure framework, which is not exhaustive. Finally, this study relies on self-reported information disclosed in annual reports and, therefore, cannot independently verify the accuracy or completeness of reported environmental performance. The findings of this study provide a set of benchmarks that companies can use to strengthen their decarbonization and sustainability targets, enhance transparency and improve operational practices and initiatives. The results of this study also support disclosure-based policy approaches as an effective driver of corporate green transition and sustainability efforts. This study may help raise public awareness of sustainability through ESG-reporting-driven transparency. BRSR disclosures provide information on corporate practices related to emissions reduction, energy and water conservation, along with a range of key environmental indicators. The findings may contribute to improved environmental health and human well-being. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is among the first to analyze a range of key firm-level environmental performance indicators for large manufacturing companies, based on their ESG reporting under the latest regulatory norms. This study provides valuable insights into the uptake of corporate environmental reporting practices, as well as persistent reporting gaps.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-08-2025-0567first seen 2026-05-05 21:54:04
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。