gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Smallholder farmer readiness for sustainable land management under the GEF7 project in semi-arid Limpopo Province, South Africa

南アフリカ・リンポポ州の半乾燥地におけるGEF7プロジェクト下の小規模農家の持続可能な土地管理への準備態勢 (AI 翻訳)

Ephias Mugari, Emogine Mamabolo, Tlou Elizabeth. Mogale, Mpho Piet Phehla, Kabisheng Mabitsela, Kingsley Kwabena Ayisi

Frontiers in Environmental Science📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-18#その他対象セクター: agriculture
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2026.1872864
原典: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1872864
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は南アフリカの半乾燥地における小規模農家の持続可能な土地管理(SLM)への準備態勢を調査。認知・動機面では高い準備性が見られたが、普及サービスの不足や集団行動の欠如などの構造的制約が課題。これらの制約に対処し、SLMを拡大するための介入が必要。

English

This study examines smallholder farmer readiness for sustainable land management (SLM) under the GEF7 project in semi-arid South Africa. While cognitive and motivational readiness is high, structural constraints such as limited extension access and lack of collective action hinder adoption. Interventions should strengthen extension systems and training to scale SLM practices.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

本論文は南アフリカの半乾燥地に焦点を当てており、日本のGX文脈には直接関係しない。ただし、気候変動適応と持続可能な農業の観点から、国際協力やODAの参考になる可能性がある。

In the global GX context

This paper provides evidence on barriers to sustainable land management adoption in semi-arid Africa, relevant to global climate adaptation and land degradation neutrality goals. It highlights the need for structural support beyond farmer willingness.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a readiness framework and empirical evidence on structural constraints for SLM adoption in semi-arid smallholder systems.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for designing extension and training programs to support sustainable land management in smallholder contexts.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of strengthening extension systems and collective action mechanisms to achieve land degradation neutrality and climate adaptation targets.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Introduction This study examines smallholder farmer readiness for sustainable land management (SLM) under the Global Environment Facility (GEF7) project in semi-arid Limpopo Province, South Africa. Methods Using a mixed-methods approach combining farmer profiling survey, key informant interviews, field observations, and community mapping, we assessed 48 farmers (79.2% female, 37.5% youth) across four readiness dimensions: cognitive, behavioural, structural, and motivational. Results Farming was predominantly rainfed and subsistence-oriented, with most households cultivating <1 ha. Most farmers (85.4%) reported land degradation indicators, primarily soil erosion (54.2%) and declining fertility (52.1%). Climate risks (drought, poor rainfall, heat stress) were identified by 85% of participants, yet access to climate information services was limited. Although 93.8% of farmers had implemented at least one SLM practice, adoption concentrated on low-cost options (manure/compost = 60.4%; crop rotation = 35.4%; agroforestry = 35.4%), while intensive practices such as contouring and controlled grazing remained rare (6.2%). Structural readiness was the primary limitation, i.e. extension access was infrequent (33.3% never accessed), only 35.4% had received SLM training, and collective action mechanisms were absent. Critically, all farmers expressed willingness to adopt improved practices if supported through training, demonstrations, and follow-up. Fisher's Exact Test revealed significant associations between extension access and adoption of agroforestry (p = 0.004) and mulching (p = 0.002). Conclusion We conclude that farmer readiness is high in cognitive and motivational dimensions but constrained by structural deficits. Interventions must prioritize strengthening extension systems, practical training, and community-level coordination to unlock existing readiness and scale SLM in semi-arid communal landscapes.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。