Recent Challenges in Data Acquisition for Scope 3 Activities in Germany: A Case Study at a Scientific Institute Operating a Production Line
ドイツにおけるスコープ3活動のデータ取得における最近の課題:生産ラインを運営する科学研究所での事例研究 (AI 翻訳)
Oskay Ozen, Jonathan Magin, Matthias Weigold
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、ドイツの科学研究所が運営する生産ラインを対象に、スコープ1〜3排出量を3年間(2022-2024年)にわたり計算した。スコープ3データ取得の難しさ、特に中小企業が外部サービスに依存せずにサプライチェーン排出量を正確に計算する困難を指摘。出張がスコープ3で最大の寄与要因であり、データ収集の自動化は製造実行システムやERPシステムの活用に依存することを示した。排出係数の感度分析では鉄鋼で25〜130%の乖離が見られた。
English
This study calculates Scope 1-3 emissions for a German scientific institute's production line over three years (2022-2024), highlighting data acquisition challenges for Scope 3, especially for SMEs. Business travel was the largest Scope 3 contributor. Automation of data collection relies on existing manufacturing systems like MES and ERP. Sensitivity analysis showed 25-130% discrepancy for steel emission factors.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもSSBJがスコープ3開示を要求する中、本論文は中小企業のデータ収集課題と自動化の可能性を示す実践的な事例を提供する。特に、製造現場でのMESやERP活用は、日本の製造業が排出量算定を効率化する上で参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a concrete case study on Scope 3 data acquisition challenges under CSRD, relevant for global corporate disclosure. It demonstrates how data automation can be achieved through existing manufacturing systems, offering insights for companies transitioning from manual to automated carbon accounting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This study offers a methodological approach for automating Scope 3 data collection and sensitivity analysis of emission factors, useful for carbon accounting research.
🏢実務担当者:Companies can leverage existing MES/ERP systems to automate emission data collection, as demonstrated in this case, reducing reliance on external service providers.
🏛政策担当者:The paper highlights the difficulties SMEs face in Scope 3 reporting, suggesting policy support for data infrastructure and standardized emission factors.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The German industrial and energy sectors accounted for over 52% of national greenhouse gas emissions in 2024. This is influenced both by an ongoing demand for fossil fuels and the usage of emission-intensive raw and processed materials. With the current European directive on corporate sustainability reporting, a push is being made for companies to publish annual emission reports. However, as per a study conducted by the authors, small and medium-sized companies have difficulties accurately calculating emissions across their supply chain without relying on external service providers. As a scientific institute with a real production facility for metal machining, the ETA (Energy Technologies and Applications) Factory bridges the gap between academia and manufacturing enterprises. The authors have used this disposition to calculate scope 1–3 emissions for the factory as per the Greenhouse Gas Protocol across three years, while progressively attempting to automate data collection for all scopes. CO2e emissions for the years 2022–2024 were 86.3 tCO2e, 146.9 tCO2e, and 86.1 tCO2e, respectively. Emission categories were assessed in terms of relevance to the institute and subsequently used to analyze the emission activities of the factory. The highest contributor to emissions was electricity purchasing for 2022 and 2024, along with business travel for 2023. Within scope 3, the emissions produced by business travel showed the highest impact across all years, followed by either energy-related activities or purchased goods. The sensitivity of CO2e factors was also investigated, showing discrepancies between 25% and 130% for the utilized CO2e factor for steel. Automation of data collection benefits largely from implemented manufacturing systems, such as manufacturing execution systems or enterprise resource planning systems.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13050270first seen 2026-05-17 07:38:40 · last seen 2026-05-20 05:23:53
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。