Unequal environmental burdens amid uneven economic gains in the global low-carbon power transition
グローバルな低炭素電力転換における不均等な経済的利益と環境負荷の不平等 (AI 翻訳)
Rao Fu, Jiashuo Li, Peipei Tian, Jinyue Chen, Bin Chen, Kuishuang Feng, Jian Zuo, Michael Goodsite, Laixiang Sun
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、1995年から2019年までのグローバルな電力サプライチェーンを対象に、化石燃料から低炭素電源への転換に伴う環境負荷と経済価値の国際的再分配を分析。先進国は低炭素化の利益の83%以上を享受する一方、環境負荷を発展途上国に転嫁しており、環境不平等が拡大していることを実証。公正なエネルギー移行に向けた制度設計の必要性を提起。
English
This study traces the cross-border relocation of environmental pressures and value added in global power supply chains from 1995 to 2019. It finds that developed regions capture over 83% of value added from the low-carbon transition while outsourcing a growing share of environmental burdens to developing regions, deepening environmental inequality. The results highlight the need for more equitable supply chains to achieve a just energy transition.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業のサプライチェーン管理やTCFD/SSBJに基づく開示において、低炭素調達に伴う環境負荷の国際的移転を考慮することが求められる。本論文は、日本が経済的利益を享受する一方で、新興国への環境負荷転嫁の実態を定量的に示しており、責任ある移行戦略の策定に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides critical evidence for global climate disclosure frameworks (e.g., ISSB, CSRD) by quantifying the uneven distribution of environmental and economic impacts along low-carbon supply chains. It underscores the importance of scope 3 accounting and just transition considerations in international climate policy and corporate reporting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Use the MRIO methodology to assess equity implications of energy transitions in other regions or sectors.
🏢実務担当者:Incorporate upstream and downstream environmental burden transfers into supply chain decarbonization strategies.
🏛政策担当者:Design international climate finance mechanisms that compensate developing countries for bearing disproportionate environmental costs.
📄 Abstract（原文）
<h2>Summary</h2> The ongoing transition from fossil fuels to low-carbon power is reshaping global power supply chains, redistributing environmental pressures and economic benefits across economies. Yet, the extent, pathways, and equity implications of this redistribution remain insufficiently understood. Here, we trace and compare the cross-border relocation of environmental pressures and value added linked to the consumption of fossil fuel-based and low-carbon power from 1995 to 2019. We find that developed regions increasingly outsource a larger share of associated pressures to developing regions while capturing a disproportionate share (more than 83%) of value added from the low-carbon power transition. Consequently, environmental inequality deepens: developed economies benefit from the transition (EV ratio < 1), whereas developing countries face rising burdens with limited economic returns (EV ratio still greater than 1). These results highlight the need for more equitable and sustainable low-carbon supply chains to achieve a just energy transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2026.100729first seen 2026-05-24 04:48:29 · last seen 2026-05-27 04:44:09
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。