Renewable energy and energy security under geopolitical vulnerability: New evidence from fragile regions
地政学的脆弱性下における再生可能エネルギーとエネルギー安全保障：脆弱地域からの新たな証拠 (AI 翻訳)
Azer Dilanchiev, İbrahim Çütçü
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、2000年から2023年までの13の地政学的に脆弱な移行経済国を対象に、エネルギー安全保障の戦略的决定要因を調査した。再生可能エネルギーの導入と工業化が長期的なエネルギー安全保障を強化する一方、制度の脆弱性とエネルギー輸入依存が阻害要因となることを示した。政策は制度的リスクプレミアムの軽減と再生可能エネルギー多様化を優先すべきと提言。
English
This study investigates energy security determinants across 13 geopolitically vulnerable transition economies from 2000-2023. Using second-generation panel econometrics and the Fragile States Index, it finds that renewable energy deployment and industrialization bolster long-term energy security, while institutional fragility and import dependence hinder it. Policies should mitigate institutional risks alongside accelerating renewable diversification.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は地政学的脆弱性が低いが、エネルギー輸入依存度が高く、本稿の制度の質と再エネ導入の関係性は、日本のエネルギー安全保障政策にも示唆を与える。特に、制度的リスクプレミアムが再エネ投資効率に与える影響は、国内規制緩和や投資環境整備の重要性を再認識させる。
In the global GX context
This paper provides empirical evidence on the interplay between institutional fragility and renewable energy deployment, complementing global discussions on transition finance in emerging markets. It highlights that policy frameworks must address institutional risks to enable effective green energy investments, which is relevant for investors and multilateral development banks considering climate finance in vulnerable regions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Empirical evidence on how institutional fragility moderates the impact of renewable energy on energy security. Offers methodological insights using the Fragile States Index.
🏢実務担当者:For corporate sustainability teams, underscores the importance of considering governance risks when planning renewable energy projects in emerging markets.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers in vulnerable economies should prioritize institutional reforms alongside renewable energy deployment to enhance energy security.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study investigates the strategic determinants of energy security across 13 geopolitically vulnerable and fragile transition economies from 2000 to 2023. Given the compounding risks of global shocks, we examine how renewable energy deployment, industrialization, urbanization, and energy import dependence interact under varying degrees of institutional stress. Methodologically, the study addresses common diagnostic challenges, including cross-sectional dependence, slope heterogeneity, and endogeneity, by employing a robust suite of second-generation panel econometric frameworks. To capture institutional and geopolitical vulnerability, the Fragile States Index (FSI) is incorporated into the model specification. The empirical findings show that renewable energy deployment and industrialization significantly bolster long-term energy security, whereas structural institutional fragility and high energy import dependence are severe impediments. Crucially, the estimates confirm that high institutional fragility acts as a structural barrier that reduces the efficiency of green energy infrastructure investments. Consequently, policy frameworks in these vulnerable regimes must prioritize mitigating institutional risk premiums alongside accelerating renewable energy diversification to secure continuous energy stability.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115470first seen 2026-07-16 05:01:20
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。