Public perceptions of climate policy fairness and effectiveness across climate policy types and domains in 15 countries
気候政策の公平性と有効性に関する市民の認識：15カ国における政策タイプと領域横断的分析 (AI 翻訳)
Nina L. Frings, Ulf J.J. Hahnel
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
15カ国（N=6,052）の調査から、気候政策の公平性・有効性認識が政策タイプや領域間で異なり、そのパターンは国家間で比較的安定していることが示された。しかし、グローバル・サウスの人々は北部よりも政策を効果的かつ公平と評価する傾向があり、気候変動への脆弱性や一人当たり排出量が認識に影響を与える。心理的要因（気候変動懸念、政治的指向）の影響も国によって異なる。
English
A survey across 15 countries (N=6,052) reveals that perceptions of climate policy fairness and effectiveness vary by policy type and domain, with patterns relatively stable across nations. However, individuals in the Global South are more optimistic about effectiveness and fairness compared to the Global North. Climate vulnerability and per-capita emissions correlate with perceptions, and the impact of psychological variables (concern, political orientation) differs by national context.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本においても気候政策への市民の受容性が重要課題となる中、本論文は政策の公平性・有効性認識が国際的文脈でどう異なるかを示す。日本の政策設計やコミュニケーション戦略に示唆を与える可能性がある。
In the global GX context
This study provides cross-country evidence on public perceptions of climate policy fairness and effectiveness, highlighting asymmetries between Global North and South. It underscores the need for policymakers to consider regional context in designing acceptable and effective mitigation policies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides psychological and contextual determinants of climate policy support across diverse countries, useful for cross-cultural policy acceptance research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for designing communication strategies that enhance perceived fairness and effectiveness of climate policies in different regions.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of tailoring climate policies to national contexts, considering vulnerability and emissions, to improve public acceptance.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Individuals are more supportive of climate policies when they think the measures are fair and effective. This evidence, however, is primarily based on data from Western samples, leaving it open how public effectiveness and fairness perceptions vary across geographical contexts and how they are shaped by regional indicators. Here, we aim to address these questions, investigating climate policy effectiveness and fairness perceptions across four policy types and two policy domains in 15 countries, covering all continents (N=6’052). Effectiveness and fairness ratings varied between policy types and domains, and this pattern was relatively stable across nations. However, individuals in the Global South were overall more optimistic about the effectiveness of climate policies and evaluated them as generally fairer compared to the Global North. Linking psychological and contextual data further shows that effectiveness and fairness perceptions were higher in countries that are more vulnerable to climate change impacts and lower in countries with higher per capita emissions. Moreover, the impact of psychological variables such as climate change concern and political orientation on both outcomes varied as a function of national context. Taken together, our findings point to important geographical asymmetries in the extent to which the public perceives climate mitigation policies as effective and fair, shaped by how much countries contribute to and are affected by climate change.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/w235k_v1first seen 2026-07-06 04:37:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。