Evaluation of C3S multi-model seasonal forecasts of wind and solar energy potential over China
中国における風力および太陽光エネルギーの潜在力に関するC3Sマルチモデル季節予報の評価 (AI 翻訳)
Liu Y
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、中国における風力と太陽光の資源ポテンシャルを予測するためのC3Sマルチモデル季節予報の性能を評価。ECMWF SEAS5が最も誤差が小さく、地形依存性や季節変動が明らかになった。リードタイム分析では、風力予報のバイアスが長期で減少するという結果が得られた。
English
This study evaluates six seasonal forecast models from C3S for wind and solar energy potential over China (2022-2024). ECMWF SEAS5 outperforms others with smallest bias. Forecast errors depend on terrain and season; wind bias decreases with longer lead times, suggesting dominance of large-scale signals. Findings guide model selection and bias correction for renewable energy forecasting.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも再エネ導入拡大が進む中、風力・太陽光発電の季節予報は電力系統運用に重要。本論文の評価手法は日本の気象条件に応用可能であり、気象庁や電力会社にとって参考になる。
In the global GX context
Seasonal forecasts of wind and solar resources are critical for grid integration of variable renewables globally. This paper provides a systematic evaluation over China, with findings on model biases and lead-time dependence that can inform operational strategies in other regions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides comparative performance metrics and bias analysis for C3S seasonal forecast models, useful for improving renewable energy forecasting.
🏢実務担当者:Can guide selection of forecast models and bias correction methods for wind and solar energy management.
📄 Abstract(原文)
<title>Abstract</title> <p>Seasonal forecasts of wind and solar resources are essential for integrating variable renewable energy into power grids, yet a systematic evaluation of multi-model seasonal forecasts for both variables over China has remained insufficient. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of six seasonal forecast models from the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) over China during 2022– 2024. At a lead time of one month, all models exhibit higher skill in simulating solar radiation than wind speed. ECMWF SEAS5 consistently outperforms the other models, showing the smallest bias and lowest root-mean-square error for both variables. Spatially, most models overestimate wind power density, especially in western and northern China, while solar radiation is commonly overestimated in the Sichuan Basin but underestimated in western China by several models. Pronounced seasonal disparities exist as solar radiation is overestimated in summer and autumn but underestimated in spring and winter, whereas wind biases peak in spring and minimize in autumn across most regions. Forecast biases exhibit a strong and systematic dependence on terrain elevation, showing a non-monotonic model-dependent reliance. Lead-time analysis reveals that with increasing lead time, solar forecast biases generally increase, whereas wind biases unexpectedly decrease, suggesting that long-lead wind forecasts could be increasingly dominated by predictable large-scale signals. These findings provide practical guidance for model selection, bias correction, and operational application of C3S seasonal forecasts in wind and solar energy management over China. The results underscore the need for model-specific bias adjustment and regionally tailored strategies to improve the reliability of renewable resource predictions.</p>
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10044389/v1first seen 2026-07-10 04:45:32
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。