Canada livestock code
カナダ畜産コード (AI 翻訳)
Xiaodi Zhang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
カナダの畜産サプライチェーンを対象に、排出税と農業補助金、普遍的排出削減補助金、排出権取引制度の3つの政策を動的確率的一般均衡モデルで分析。秩序ある移行は無秩序よりも低ボラティリティで長期的成長を達成し、補助金が技術革新と排出原単位削減に最も効果的であることを示した。
English
This paper develops a multi-sector DSGE model for Canada's livestock supply chain to analyze three abatement policies: emission taxes with agricultural subsidies, universal emission-reduction subsidies, and an ETS. Orderly transitions consistently yield lower volatility and stronger long-term growth. Universal subsidies achieve greatest gains in technological innovation and emission intensity reduction, while combining moderate taxes with substantial subsidies offers the best economic-environmental trade-offs.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
カナダの畜産セクターを対象とするが、日本の畜産・農業分野の脱炭素政策（メタン削減、補助金設計、排出権取引）にも示唆を与える。特に、政策ミックスと移行経路の予測可能性が重要である点は、日本のGX政策にも共通する教訓。
In the global GX context
While focused on Canada, this paper offers insights for global livestock decarbonization, especially the role of policy design and transition predictability. The DSGE approach integrating sectoral input-output and technology adoption is relevant for ISSB and TCFD-aligned scenario analysis.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Demonstrates a rigorous DSGE framework for evaluating livestock abatement policies, useful for modelers in agricultural climate policy.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights that universal subsidies combined with moderate taxes can optimize economic and environmental outcomes; relevant for corporate sustainability planning in livestock supply chains.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the importance of orderly transition and policy mix; provides quantitative support for combining carbon pricing with sector-specific subsidies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Given that the livestock sector is the dominant source of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in Canada, its effective decarbonization is indispensable for meeting national carbon-neutrality targets by 2050 and advancing the country’s climate agenda. This paper develops a multi-sector dynamic stocahstic general equilibrium(DSGE) model for Canada’s livestock supply chain to quantify the impacts of 3 abatement policies: emission taxes with agricultural subsidies, universal emission-reduction subsidies, and an emission trading scheme (ETS). The 10-sector input-output framework traces policy-induced volatility to individual sectors, endogenises sectoral low-carbon technological progress, and incorporates a preference-production feedback loop linking household environmental disutility to carbon pricing and firm abatement investment. The effects of these policies—each under orderly and disorderly transition regimes—are compared. Results show orderly transitions consistently yield lower volatility, greater stability, and stronger long-term growth than disorderly paths. Universal subsidies achieve the greatest gains in technological innovation, capital accumulation, and emission intensity reduction. Emission taxes with agricultural subsidies suppress short-term output but enhance long-term abatement. ETS policies cause a “technological delay,” slowing abatement technology adoption despite initial output gains. Combining moderate taxes with substantial subsidies delivers the best economic-environmental trade-offs, highlighting that both policy mix and implementation predictability are key to decarbonization performance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32780691first seen 2026-07-15 04:49:46
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。