Pricing and Emission Reduction Decisions in a Green Supply Chain: The Roles of Consumer Environmental Awareness, Carbon Tax Policy, and Cooperation Modes
グリーンサプライチェーンにおける価格設定と排出削減決定：消費者の環境意識、炭素税政策、および協力モードの役割 (AI 翻訳)
Yaping Zhao, Weilei Feng, Xiaoxin Ren
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、炭素税政策と消費者の環境意識の下でのグリーンサプライチェーンの排出削減と価格決定をゲーム理論で分析。非協力、排出削減協力、価格協力、完全協力の4つの協力構造を比較し、環境意識が投資や税政策に影響することを示した。特に、価格協力は排出削減を促進し、完全協力は環境と経済のバランスを最適化する。
English
This paper uses game theory to examine carbon reduction and pricing decisions in a green supply chain under carbon tax and consumer environmental awareness. It compares four cooperation structures and finds that consumer awareness significantly affects green investment and tax policy. Pricing cooperation strongly incentivizes emission reductions, while full cooperation balances environmental and economic performance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では炭素税の導入が進んでおり、本論文の協力モード分析はサプライチェーン全体での排出削減戦略に示唆を与える。特に価格協力の有効性は、日本企業の連携強化に役立つ可能性がある。
In the global GX context
As carbon tax policies spread globally, this study offers theoretical insights into how cooperation modes in supply chains can enhance emission reductions. The findings on pricing cooperation are relevant for designing effective carbon tax schemes and promoting sustainable collaboration across industries.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a game-theoretic framework comparing cooperation modes in green supply chains, with nonlinear effects of consumer awareness and carbon tax.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights that pricing cooperation between manufacturers and retailers can incentivize emission reductions, useful for supply chain coordination.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that carbon tax design should account for consumer environmental awareness and cooperation structures to maximize environmental and economic outcomes.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This paper investigates carbon reduction and pricing decisions in a green supply chain composed of a government, a manufacturer, and a retailer, under the joint influence of carbon tax policies and consumer environmental awareness. A game-theoretic framework is developed to systematically compare four cooperation structures: non-cooperation, emission reduction cooperation, pricing cooperation, and full cooperation. The results show that consumer environmental awareness significantly influences firms’ green investment, pricing strategies, and the government’s carbon tax policy. The analysis further reveals several nonlinear effects under different cooperation modes. In particular, when environmental performance is evaluated in terms of emission intensity, emission-reduction investment improves per-unit environmental performance, although demand expansion under strong consumer environmental awareness may weaken the extent of this improvement. In less environmentally sensitive markets, green investment translates more directly into environmental improvement. Pricing cooperation provides strong incentives for firms to reduce emissions, whereas full cooperation achieves a better balance between environmental and economic performance. This study enriches the theoretical foundation of green supply chain coordination and offers practical insights into carbon tax design and sustainable collaboration strategies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.3390/su18136613first seen 2026-07-01 05:53:05
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。