Reimagining Residential Buildings: Design, Ventilation and Health in the Era of Climate Change and Pandemics
気候変動とパンデミック時代における住宅の再考：設計、換気、健康 (AI 翻訳)
Alan Kabanshi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、住宅を気候・健康・仕事の適応システムとして再構築することを提案。一戸建てと集合住宅の特性比較、換気戦略、熱的快適性、感染症対策、在宅勤務への対応を総合的に分析し、将来の住宅性能基準を提案する。
English
This review proposes reimagining residential buildings as adaptive climate-health-work systems. It synthesizes evidence on dwelling typologies, ventilation strategies, overheating, airborne infection resilience, and post-pandemic occupancy to develop a framework for aligning design, retrofit, and policy with health, indoor environmental quality, energy efficiency, and carbon performance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では既存住宅の断熱・換気性能向上が急務。本論文はパンデミック後の住宅設計に示唆を与えるが、日本の建築基準法・省エネ基準との接続は限定的。読者には住宅の脱炭素と健康の両立を考える枠組みを提供する。
In the global GX context
Globally, this review aligns with the growing focus on building decarbonization and resilience. It provides a framework for integrating health, ventilation, and energy performance, relevant to TCFD/ISSB's emphasis on physical climate risks and transition to low-carbon buildings.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers can use the proposed taxonomy for hypothesis generation and benchmark development in residential building performance.
🏢実務担当者:Building designers and developers can leverage the framework to align design with health, energy, and carbon goals.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers may find the review useful for updating building codes to address overheating, airborne infection, and remote work.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Residential buildings must now be designed and retrofitted as adaptive climate–health–work systems rather than as static housing units. This structured literature review synthesises peer-reviewed journal and conference evidence on residential taxonomy, ventilation, indoor environmental quality, overheating, airborne infection resilience, post-pandemic occupancy changes and future performance benchmarks. The review shows that single-family and multifamily buildings remain the most practical first-order categories because they differ in envelope exposure, ventilation pathways, system ownership, governance, retrofit feasibility and occupant control. Single-family dwellings generally provide greater household autonomy, roof-based renewable potential and room-level intervention flexibility, but can also carry higher envelope losses, lower density and stronger dependence on occupant operation. Multifamily buildings benefit from compactness and shared infrastructure, yet face additional risks from common services, vertical shafts, stack effects, corridor pressurisation, inter-zonal airflow and collective maintenance. Ventilation evidence indicates that natural, exhaust-only, supply, balanced heat-recovery, hybrid, demand-controlled and filtration-based strategies cannot be ranked universally; their effectiveness depends on climate, airtightness, pollutant source, occupancy, maintenance and governance. This review further shows that overheating, cooling-demand growth, airborne infection preparedness and remote work are shifting residential performance from winter-centric energy efficiency toward year-round thermal resilience, clean-air delivery and prolonged-occupancy functionality. A future taxonomy is therefore proposed around adaptive performance attributes, including thermal resilience, clean-air capacity, ventilation controllability, energy flexibility, remote-work readiness, vulnerability and retrofit potential. The core contribution is a hypothesis-generating, decision-support and benchmark-development framework for aligning residential design, retrofit and policy with health, indoor environmental quality, energy efficiency and carbon performance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/en19122859first seen 2026-07-06 04:36:22
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。