gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Impact of Carbon Pricing Policies on Environmental Sustainability

カーボンプライシング政策が環境持続可能性に与える影響 (AI 翻訳)

Harsh Dugar, Ashish Kumar

ANUSANDHAN – NDIM's Journal of Business and Management Research📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-10#炭素価格経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.56411/anusandhan.2026.v8i1.35-44
原典: https://qtanalytics.in/journals/index.php/ANUSANDHAN/article/download/5564/2758
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

1990~2024年のデータを用いて、炭素税(CT)と排出量取引制度(ETS)のCO2削減効果を実証比較。ETSは有意な削減効果を示す一方、CTの長期効果は統計的に有意でない。政策立案者に示唆を提供。

English

Using data from 1990-2024, this paper empirically compares the CO2 reduction effects of carbon taxes (CT) and emissions trading schemes (ETS). ETS shows significant reduction, while CT's long-term effect is statistically insignificant. Provides insights for policymakers aiming for net-zero.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではGXリーグやカーボンプライシングの本格導入が議論されており、ETSとCTの効果比較は国内政策設計に直接示唆を与える。特に、日本の排出量取引制度(GX-ETS)の有効性を評価する際の参考となる。

In the global GX context

This paper adds cross-country empirical evidence on the effectiveness of carbon pricing instruments, relevant to global debates under TCFD/ISSB and transition finance frameworks. It supports the case for ETS as a more effective tool, informing international policy convergence.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a robust empirical comparison of CT vs. ETS using panel data and diagnostic tests, contributing to carbon pricing literature.

🏢実務担当者:Helps corporate sustainability teams assess regulatory risk and compliance costs under different carbon pricing regimes.

🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence that ETS may outperform carbon taxes in long-run emission reductions, informing policy design.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Carbon pricing is a policy tool that has become one of the most significant tools in the global effort to address the problem of climate change through the internalisation of the externality of greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon taxes (CT) and emissions trading schemes (ETS) are two phenomena that have become key instruments in supporting the global campaign against climate change. Despite this fact, empirical research disregarded the role played by these instruments in mitigating carbon emissions by expressly considering the countries that have CT and ETS in place. In this paper, the author will analyze the effects that the two carbon pricing policies will have on carbon dioxide emissions between the years 1990 and 2024. The empirical approach is followed by the thorough method of diagnostics, and the tests of cross-sectional dependence, slope heterogeneity, panel unit roots, and cointegration. The results showthat ETS has better performance in reducing emissions compared with CT whose effects are less and statistically unimportant in the long term. This paper can be seen as a contribution to the literature as it connects the policy, providing viable insights to policymakers striving to effect net-zero changes.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。