HALAL CERTIFICATION OF CULTIVATED MEAT IN SINGAPORE: DEVELOPING THE HALAL GOVERNANCE & REGULATORY READINESS ASSESSMENT (HGRRA) FRAMEWORK
シンガポールにおける培養肉のハラール認証：ハラールガバナンスと規制準備評価（HGRRA）フレームワークの開発 (AI 翻訳)
Mohamed Faizal Abdul Hathi, N. Ramli
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、シンガポールにおける培養肉のハラール認証の準備状態を評価するためのHGRRAフレームワークを開発・適用する。6つの領域にわたるガバナンス成熟度を分析し、シンガポールは構造的準備が整ったTier 3にあると結論付けたが、生物工学特有の監査や実験室能力に課題がある。この枠組みは、新興食品システムに対するシャリーア原則の適応性を示し、将来のハラール規制システムへの示唆を提供する。
English
This paper develops the Halal Governance and Regulatory Readiness Assessment (HGRRA) framework to evaluate Singapore's readiness to certify cultivated meat as halal. It finds Singapore at Tier 3: Structured Readiness, with strong legal and doctrinal foundations but gaps in biotechnology audit and laboratory capacity. The study demonstrates adaptability of Shariah principles to novel food systems and proposes a governance model for halal authorities.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では培養肉のハラール認証はほとんど議論されていないが、食品の持続可能性や新規食品規制の観点から、本フレームワークは日本における培養肉の認証制度設計に参考となる可能性がある。ただし、GX文脈での直接的な関連性は低い。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global discourse on regulating cellular agriculture for sustainability. The HGRRA framework is a replicable tool for assessing regulatory readiness in halal certification, which is relevant for food security and ethical consumption in Muslim-majority and minority contexts.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Scholars in halal studies, food technology, and regulatory governance can adopt the HGRRA framework for comparative analysis.
🏢実務担当者:Halal certification bodies and food companies can use the framework to identify gaps in their certification processes for cultivated meat.
🏛政策担当者:Regulators in food safety and religious affairs can consider the governance domains and tier progression for developing halal biotechnology standards.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Cultivated meat produced through cellular agriculture offers potential benefits for sustainability, food security, and ethical consumption, yet presents complex halal-certification challenges, particularly in Muslim-minority contexts where religious authority and scientific regulation must be closely integrated. This article develops and applies the Halal Governance and Regulatory Readiness Assessment (HGRRA) framework to evaluate Singapore’s preparedness to certify cultivated meat as halal. Using a qualitative doctrinal and document-based method, the study analyses statutory provisions, the 2024 MUIS fatwa, halal-assurance manuals, food-safety guidelines, and scholarly literature published between 2022 and 2025. The HGRRA assesses governance maturity across six domains: Legal Mandate, Sharīʿah Framework, Technical Expertise, Infrastructure, Stakeholder Engagement, and International Alignment through a four-tier continuum. Findings place Singapore at Tier 3: Structured Readiness, reflecting strong legal authority, doctrinal clarity, and coordinated regulatory oversight, but limited by gaps in biotechnology-specific audit mechanisms, laboratory capacity, and institutionalised engagement structures. Advancing toward Tier 4: Managed Readiness will require operationalising fatwa conditions within HalMQ, accrediting halal-relevant biotechnology laboratories, enhancing scientific competencies among auditors, and promoting regional harmonisation of halal-biotechnology standards. The study demonstrates the adaptability of Sharīʿah principles to emerging food systems and proposes a structured, maqāṣid-informed governance model for halal authorities navigating biotechnological innovation. By offering a replicable readiness framework, this research contributes to global efforts to develop coherent, future-oriented halal regulatory systems for cellular-agriculture products.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://mjsl.usim.edu.my/index.php/jurnalmjsl/article/download/1699/566first seen 2026-07-16 06:26:52
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。