Driving Decarbonization: A Life Cycle Assessment of Road Freight Transport Using Locally Produced Green Hydrogen in The Netherlands
オランダにおける地産グリーン水素を用いた道路貨物輸送の脱炭素化：ライフサイクルアセスメント (AI 翻訳)
Ruben van den Berg, Daniël Bakker, Coen van der Giesen, Ron Bol, Tessa van den Brand
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はオランダの道路貨物輸送において、燃料電池電気自動車(FCEV)、水素内燃機関(HICEV)、バッテリ電気自動車(BEV)、ディーゼル内燃機関(DICEV)の4種類のトラックのライフサイクルアセスメント(LCA)を実施。地産のグリーン水素と電力、ディーゼルを比較し、グリーン水素を使用した場合にFCEVとHICEVが最も地球温暖化影響が低いことを示した。水消費量は太陽光発電に強く影響されるなど、グリーン水素の環境影響の複雑さを明らかにした。
English
This study performs a life cycle assessment of four truck types (FCEV, HICEV, BEV, diesel) for road freight transport in the Netherlands, comparing locally produced green hydrogen, electricity, and diesel. It finds that FCEV and HICEV achieve the lowest global warming impact with green hydrogen. Water consumption for green hydrogen is strongly influenced by solar-powered electricity. The results highlight the need for further exploration of green hydrogen's environmental impacts.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
オランダの事例は、日本の水素基本戦略やトラック輸送の脱炭素化政策に示唆を与える。グリーン水素のLCA評価手法は日本でも有用である。
In the global GX context
This LCA provides a detailed comparison of powertrain technologies for heavy-duty transport, relevant for the global transition to zero-emission freight. It underscores the importance of considering upstream impacts of hydrogen production, including water use, which is critical for scaling green hydrogen. The study aligns with EU regulations and ISSB/SEC climate disclosure requirements for supply chain emissions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Useful for LCA practitioners and transport decarbonization researchers to understand system boundaries and key impact drivers.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate fleets and logistics companies can use these comparisons to inform investment in alternative fuel trucks and infrastructure.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can leverage the findings to design incentives for green hydrogen production and align with net-zero targets for freight.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Road freight transport is an important driver of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Decarbonizing this sector demands a comprehensive assessment of emerging powertrain technologies, which are currently lacking in the literature. To fill this knowledge gap, we performed a life cycle assessment (LCA) on 10 impact categories to evaluate road freight transport in the Netherlands of four truck alternatives, assuming similar performance: fuel-cell electric (FCEV), hydrogen internal combustion engine (HICEV), battery electric (BEV), and diesel internal combustion engine (DICEV). We compared locally produced green hydrogen, according to EU regulations, with electricity and diesel as alternative fuel chains, while also considering the environmental impact of road infrastructure. We found that FCEV and HICEV trucks achieve the lowest global warming impact when green hydrogen is used. We identified discrepancies between the transport alternatives, highlighting key factors influencing NOx and particulate matter emissions. Our research also showed that water consumption (WC) for green hydrogen is strongly influenced by upstream processes, with solar-powered electricity emerging as a crucial contributor. Our results highlight the need for more exploration on the environmental impact of green hydrogen and can be used by researchers and practitioners to further understand the complexity of reducing emissions in road freight transport.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102433first seen 2026-05-20 05:50:43
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。