Governing Low-Carbon Landscapes: A Systematic Review of Incentives, Spatial Planning, and Community Forest Management
低炭素景観のガバナンス：インセンティブ、空間計画、コミュニティ森林管理に関する系統的レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Saiyuli Saiyuli, Ristia Mareta, Sherin Evangelistha, Vivin Nugrika, Muh Arief Syam, Rian Pebriansyah, Bima Dwi Putra Bhayangkara, Jeremy Given Adriel Orlando Panjaitan, Widya Anjani Anwar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、低炭素開発のためのインセンティブ政策、空間計画、コミュニティ森林管理の統合的効果を検証した。13の実証研究から、REDD+やPESなどのインセンティブとコミュニティ管理は広く実施されているが、空間計画の統合は不十分であることがわかった。成功要因として参加型ガバナンス、透明な利益配分、長期的な制度設計が挙げられ、阻害要因として政府への不信、取引コスト、短期的政策などが特定された。
English
This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on integrating incentive policies, spatial planning, and community forest management for low-carbon development. Based on 13 studies from 11 countries, it finds that incentives such as REDD+, carbon credits, and PES are widely implemented, but spatial planning remains weakly integrated. Success factors include participatory governance, transparent benefit-sharing, and flexible long-term schemes, while barriers include distrust in government, high transaction costs, and short-term policies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、J-クレジット制度や森林管理と地域コミュニティの連携が進んでいる。本レビューの知見（参加型ガバナンス、長期的インセンティブ設計）は、日本の森林由来カーボンクレジット制度や地方創生政策に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, incentive mechanisms like REDD+ and PES are central to forest-based climate mitigation. This review highlights the persistent gap between these incentives and spatial planning, offering lessons for integrated low-carbon landscape governance under the Paris Agreement and emerging carbon markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a systematic synthesis of empirical evidence on the integration of incentives, spatial planning, and community forest management, identifying research gaps and methodological biases.
🏢実務担当者:Offers actionable insights on success factors (e.g., participatory governance, long-term schemes) and barriers (e.g., high transaction costs, elite capture) for designing community-based carbon projects.
🏛政策担当者:Recommends prioritizing flexible, long-term incentive designs, secure land tenure, and cross-sectoral coordination for effective low-carbon development policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
<ns5:p>Integrating incentive policies, spatial planning, and community forest management is increasingly promoted for low-carbon development, yet evidence on their combined effectiveness remains fragmented. This systematic review synthesises empirical evidence across diverse geographic and institutional contexts. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched Scopus, Springer, and ScienceDirect using a search string combining low-carbon, community, incentives, planning, and forest management. Studies published between 2016 and 2026 in English, open access, and reporting empirical research were included. After title-abstract (n = 503) and full-text screening (n = 58), 13 studies from 11 countries were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Thematic synthesis was conducted based on the PEO framework (Population, Exposure, Outcome). Incentive mechanisms (REDD+, carbon credits, PES, tax relief ) and community forest management (CFMGs, agroforestry, NTFP commercialisation) are widely implemented, but spatial planning remains weakly integrated. Success factors include participatory governance, transparent benefit-sharing, flexible long-term schemes, and trusted local advisory support. Persistent barriers distrust in government, high transaction costs, short-term policies, gender inequities, weak state authority, elite capture, and leakage consistently undermine outcomes. Risk of bias assessment revealed moderate-to-low risk across most studies, with common limitations being lack of researcher reflexivity and reliance on secondary data. Technical carbon interventions cannot succeed without addressing power asymmetries, strengthening local institutions, and placing communities at the centre of decision-making. Policies should prioritise flexible, long-term incentive design, gender-responsive approaches, secure land tenure, and cross-sectoral coordination.</ns5:p>
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.183637.1first seen 2026-07-10 05:16:32 · last seen 2026-07-10 05:28:56
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。