Gender diversity on corporate boards and sustainability disclosures: a quantile regression approach
企業取締役会のジェンダー多様性とサステナビリティ開示:分位点回帰アプローチ (AI 翻訳)
Peter Kodjo Luh, Nicholas Asare
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、アフリカ13カ国の422社の2006~2020年のデータを用いて、取締役会のジェンダー多様性がESG開示に与える影響を分位点回帰で分析した。結果、女性取締役の増加はESG開示を促進し、その効果は特定の分位点で顕著になることが示された。アフリカにおけるクオータ制の導入を提案している。
English
This study examines the effect of board gender diversity on ESG disclosure using quantile regression on 422 African firms from 2006-2020. Findings show that increasing women on boards positively affects ESG disclosure, with effects varying across quantiles. The study supports critical mass theory and advocates for gender quota policies in Africa.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
アフリカを対象とした研究だが、日本のESG開示や統合報告における取締役会の多様性の重要性を示唆する。日本でも女性取締役比率の目標設定が進む中、ジェンダー多様性と開示の質の関係を理解する上で参考になる。
In the global GX context
This research adds to the global evidence on board gender diversity and ESG disclosure, showing that the relationship is not uniform across disclosure levels. It highlights the need for diversity policies beyond mere representation, relevant for global ESG frameworks like ISSB and CSRD.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers quantile regression methodology to capture heterogeneous effects in ESG disclosure research.
🏢実務担当者:Provides evidence that increasing women on boards can enhance ESG disclosure quality, supporting diversity initiatives.
🏛政策担当者:Reinforces the case for gender quota policies to improve corporate transparency and sustainability reporting.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Purpose This study aims to examine how ESG disclosure (i.e. sustainability disclosure) responds to board gender diversity using a conditional panel quantile regression approach. Design/methodology/approach Data was obtained from the audited annual reports of 422 firms listed on stock exchanges across 13 countries in Africa for the period 2006–2020. Empirical results were generated using conditional panel quantile regression, but GMM was also used to confirm result robustness. Findings The findings provide evidence that board gender diversity positively affects ESG disclosure. More specifically, the results provide evidence that the economic effect of board gender diversity on ESG disclosure gets pronounced/amplified at different quantile levels, supporting the arguments of critical mass. Research limitations/implications The study used data of 422 firms from 13 African economies for the period 2006-2020 to estimate the heterogeneous effect of board gender diversity on sustainability disclosures. Further research can focus on the interplay between different dimensions of board diversity in affecting corporate and sustainability performance. Practical implications Overall, the result advances the case for firms to pursue gender inclusive strategies/policies that increase the number of women or ensure more gender balance on their boards because it comes with higher benefits as far as sustainability reporting is concerned. In terms of policy, the study reaffirms the need for relevant stakeholders in Africa to come up with a quota policy as far as women representation on boards is concerned. Originality/value Majority of studies, particularly those pertaining to board gender diversity have focused on how a percentage increase or decrease impacts organizational outcomes (where mean effect has been largely considered). This study significantly provides that lower number of women on boards may not bring out the best in them as far as the issue of ESG disclosure in Africa is concerned.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。