Competition Law in Fragmented Aviation Sustainability Regimes
断片化した航空サステナビリティ体制における競争法 (AI 翻訳)
A. Lonkar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、航空脱炭素に向けた競争企業間の協力を阻害する競争法の問題を分析。EUと英国の競争法は協力を許容する方向に進化しているが、米国は不透明。SAFの共同調達や相互運用可能な登録簿などの協力を可能にする「セーフハーバー・プラス」枠組を提案。
English
This paper analyzes competition law barriers to airline cooperation for decarbonization. It finds EU and UK competition law evolving to accommodate sustainability collaboration, while the US remains uncertain. It proposes a 'safe-harbour-plus' blueprint enabling joint SAF procurement, interoperable registries, and open standard-setting.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では航空脱炭素に関する競争法上の議論はまだ成熟していない。本稿のEU/UKの枠組は、日本がSAF導入促進やCORSIA対応で企業連携を検討する際の参考になる。ただし、日本の競争法（独禁法）との整合性は別途検討が必要。
In the global GX context
This paper addresses a critical gap: how competition law can support rather than hinder climate collaboration in fragmented regulatory environments like aviation. It provides a concrete blueprint for policymakers and airlines navigating overlapping regimes (CORSIA, EU ETS, ReFuelEU). The analysis is relevant for global discussions on enabling collective climate action through legal frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a novel legal analysis of competition law in aviation decarbonization, useful for scholars studying regulatory fragmentation and sustainability cooperation.
🏢実務担当者:Provides a safe-harbour framework for airlines and SAF suppliers to structure collaborative initiatives while minimizing antitrust risk.
🏛政策担当者:Proposes a model for competition authorities to update guidelines to accommodate sustainability collaborations, relevant for EU, UK, and US policy reform.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Aviation decarbonization depends on cooperation among competitors, yet competition law considerations can affect such efforts. Airlines increasingly pursue collaborative sustainability initiatives, including joint offtake of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), interoperable bookand-claim registries, and shared monitoring and verification frameworks. This article argues that competition law frameworks in the EU and United Kingdom (UK) are evolving – albeit unevenly – to accommodate such sustainability collaboration, while the US remains more uncertain. It shows that regulatory fragmentation across SAF definitions, carbon-pricing regimes, and compliance rules both increases the need for private coordination and complicates its legal design. After mapping this fragmented landscape, including Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), EU Emissions Trading System, ReFuelEU, and the UK SAF Mandate, the article analyses recent EU, UK, and US competition law developments. It proposes a safe-harbour-plus blueprint for airline sustainability collaboration, based on open standard-setting, joint SAF procurement with safeguards, and interoperable registries. Properly structured, such cooperation can satisfy competition law requirements while enabling aviation decarbonization. The analysis demonstrates that competition law can facilitate – not merely constrain – collective climate action in fragmented regulatory environments.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.54648/aila2026021first seen 2026-06-29 05:57:20
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。