Developing a PESTLE based model to review the energy transition accelerator parameters in Australia
Maryam A. Borojerdi, Mohsen Yahyaei, Shabbir Ahmad, Lutfun Nahar Lata
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、オーストラリアの再生可能エネルギーへの転換を促進する要因を体系的に評価するため、PESTLE（政治、経済、社会、技術、法律、環境）枠組みを開発した。39のサブ要因を特定し、Q手法と半構造化インタビューを組み合わせて専門家の優先順位を分析。結果、利害関係者の間で最も影響力のない要因では一致したが、最も影響力のある要因では見解が分かれた。政策立案者への実践的示唆を提供。
English
This study developed a PESTLE-based framework (political, economic, social, technological, legal, environmental) with 39 sub-factors to evaluate drivers of Australia's renewable energy transition. Using Q methodology and semi-structured interviews with experts, it identified convergent views on least influential factors but divergent views on most impactful ones, offering actionable policy insights.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文はオーストラリアを対象としているが、日本でもエネルギー転換の政策分析に同様の枠組みを適用できる。SSBJ等の開示基準と連動した政策的合意形成に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
While focused on Australia, the PESTLE+Q methodology is transferable to other national contexts, offering a structured approach for policymakers to identify synergies in energy transition. It supports evidence-based policy design aligned with global decarbonization goals.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The integration of Q methodology with PESTLE framework provides a replicable analytical approach for studying stakeholder perspectives in energy transitions.
🏢実務担当者:The 39 sub-factors offer a checklist for organizations to assess external drivers affecting their renewable energy strategies.
🏛政策担当者:The identified convergent/diverge nt perspectives highlight where policy consensus is possible and where targeted engagement is needed.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Governments and policymakers have lacked comprehensive analytical frameworks to systematically identify and evaluate synergies among different energy generation sources. This study developed a PESTLE-based framework (encompassing political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental aspects) to improve understanding of the drivers underpinning the transition to renewable energy (RE). These aspects consist of 39 sub-factors, enabling a granular assessment of influences shaping energy transition decision-making and providing policymakers with structured insights to support effective policy development. The research was conducted in three phases. Phase 1 involved a systematic review of recent peer-reviewed literature and International Energy Agency policy documents to identify relevant PESTLE aspects and sub-factors. In Phase 2, following ethical approval, the 39 sub-factors were prioritised by domain experts using a pilot-tested questionnaire administered through Q methodology, with participants also invited to identify additional influential factors. Phase 3 comprised semi-structured interviews conducted after analysis of the Q-sort results to provide clarification and contextual interpretation. The results identified three overarching stakeholder perspectives that converged on the least influential drivers of the energy transition but diverged on the most impactful factors, reflecting differing stakeholder priorities. The integration of Q methodology and qualitative interviews enabled a systematic examination of diverse viewpoints within the PESTLE framework, enhancing the robustness and interpretive depth of the findings and highlighting the complexity of socio-technical energy transitions. The findings offer actionable insights for policymakers, supporting the development of targeted policies to facilitate Australia’s transition to renewable energy. Future research is encouraged to incorporate broader socio-economic considerations and further examine the role of policy and legislative mechanisms to support more inclusive and effective transition pathways.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03739-zfirst seen 2026-07-07 04:37:13
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。