Sustainable Concrete Production Using Agricultural Waste Ash in Pakistan’s Construction Industry
パキスタン建設産業における農業廃棄物灰を用いた持続可能なコンクリート生産 (AI 翻訳)
Nadeem Iqbal, Gohar Nadeem, Ameer
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、パキスタンの建設産業における農業廃棄物灰(籾殻灰、サトウキビバガス灰など)をセメント代替材料として活用する可能性を評価。最適条件下で10-30%のセメント代替が可能で、圧縮強度5-25%向上、CO2排出量15-40%削減、コスト8-20%削減を示す。課題は灰組成の変動や標準化不足だが、前処理と政策提言で対応可能と結論。
English
This review evaluates the use of agricultural waste ashes (RHA, SCBA, etc.) as supplementary cementitious materials in Pakistan's construction industry. Optimal processing enables 10-30% cement replacement with 5-25% compressive strength improvement, 15-40% reduction in CO2 emissions, and 8-20% cost savings. Challenges include variable ash composition and lack of standards, addressed by preprocessing and policy recommendations.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
パキスタン特有の研究だが、日本の建設業界でもセメント代替材料の研究は盛んであり、特に農業廃棄物の有効活用は廃棄物削減とGXに貢献する点で示唆に富む。ただし、日本の建築基準や材料特性は異なるため、直接適用には留意が必要。
In the global GX context
While focused on Pakistan, this paper provides quantitative evidence on the decarbonization potential of agricultural waste ash in concrete, relevant to global construction sector emissions. The LCA and cost data offer useful benchmarks for similar circular economy initiatives in developing and emerging economies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This review aggregates LCA and performance data on agricultural waste ash as SCM, providing a regional benchmark for further optimization and standardization research.
🏢実務担当者:Construction firms can use the cost and performance data to evaluate ash-based concrete for non-structural applications, with potential cost savings of 8-20%.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can consider incentives for ash utilization and inclusion in building codes to reduce cement industry emissions and waste burning.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Pakistan’s construction sector, contributing ~5.3% to GDP and driven by a cement industry with an installed capacity exceeding 86 million tons annually, faces mounting sustainability pressures from high energy consumption, coal dependency, substantial CO₂ emissions (~8–10% of national total), and depletion of conventional aggregates. This review evaluates the incorporation of agricultural waste ashes rice husk ash (RHA), sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA), wheat straw ash, corn cob ash, and cotton stalk ash as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) and partial fine aggregate replacements in concrete production. Pozzolanic reactivity, particularly of RHA and SCBA (SiO₂ content 70–90%, fineness 20–40 m²/g), enables 10–30% cement replacement while improving compressive strength (5–25% gain at 28–90 days), durability (reduced chloride permeability, sulfate resistance, water absorption), and workability when optimally processed (controlled burning at 600–700 °C, grinding to <45 μm). Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies indicate 15–40% reductions in global warming potential, fossil energy demand, and embodied carbon compared to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete, alongside waste diversion from open burning (reducing ~1.2–2.0 t CO₂-eq per ton of ash utilized). Field and lab trials in Punjab and Sindh demonstrate structural feasibility for non-load-bearing elements, pavements, and low-to-medium strength concrete (20–40 MPa), with cost savings of 8–20% from lower cement and disposal expenses. Challenges variable ash composition, seasonal supply, grinding energy, alkali-silica reaction risk, and limited standardization are addressed through preprocessing protocols, mix optimization, and policy recommendations (incentives for ash utilization, inclusion in building codes). Agricultural waste ash emerges as a regionally abundant, low-cost, circular solution to enhance sustainability and resilience in Pakistan’s rapidly urbanizing construction industry.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.63163/jpehss.v4i1.1295first seen 2026-06-29 07:11:27
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。