Challenges and priorities for forest-based climate change mitigation: a global expert elicitation
森林に基づく気候変動緩和の課題と優先事項：世界的な専門家意見の抽出 (AI 翻訳)
Catalina Gonda
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、森林ベースの気候変動緩和を妨げる課題について、世界各地の専門家の認識をグループ概念マッピングで分析。資金、ガバナンス、先住民の権利、炭素会計などで一致と相違が明らかになった。重要な障壁ほど実行可能性が低く、現在のガバナンス体制の不十分さが示唆された。
English
This paper uses Group Concept Mapping to elicit expert views on challenges to forest-based climate mitigation. It finds convergence on finance, governance, and indigenous rights issues, but divergence on carbon accounting and offsetting. A core tension emerges: the most consequential barriers are seen as least feasible to overcome, questioning current governance fitness.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では森林吸収源を活用したJ-クレジット制度が進む中、本稿の知見は炭素会計やオフセットの信頼性向上に示唆を与える。特に政治・規範的側面を重視する点が、日本の森林政策の再評価に役立つ。
In the global GX context
Globally, the paper informs REDD+ and voluntary carbon market debates by highlighting political and normative barriers. It challenges the assumption that technical fixes suffice, urging attention to governance and equity in forest-climate interventions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Methodology (Group Concept Mapping) and novel findings on expert consensus/dissensus can inform future governance studies.
🏢実務担当者:Companies engaged in forest carbon projects should note the gap between impact and feasibility of barriers, especially around carbon accounting and offsetting credibility.
🏛政策担当者:Key policy insight: addressing tractable epistemic governance issues while recognizing deep political constraints is necessary for forest mitigation progress.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Forests are central to global mitigation strategies, yet efforts to advance forest‑based climate action remain contentious and slow. Mainstream assessments tend to focus on technical, economic, and institutional barriers but often overlook the political and normative dimensions of why progress stalls. This paper examines how forest and climate experts across different regions and sectors appraise challenges to forest-based climate mitigation, where they align or disagree, and which barriers are seen as most impactful and feasible to address. Using Group Concept Mapping, the study surfaces contestation over how challenges are framed and whose knowledge and interests are reflected in forest-climate decisions. Expert ratings show broad convergence around the importance of challenges related to finance, governance, Indigenous Peoples’ and local communities’ rights, and accounting for multiple forest values. Assessments diverged more on carbon accounting, offsetting, the power and influence of different actors and forest management approaches. Critically, the analysis reveals a core tension in forest-climate governance: barriers perceived as most consequential are seen as the least feasible to overcome, calling into question whether current governance systems are fit for purpose. Only a small set of challenges, mostly pertaining to epistemic governance issues, are viewed as both relatively impactful and feasible to tackle. These findings suggest that advancing forest-based mitigation will require addressing shared and tractable priorities in the near term, while confronting the deeper governance and political constraints that currently limit action on the most critical barriers.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-026-10332-2first seen 2026-07-13 04:58:29
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。