gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Korea-EU Cooperation on Energy Transition: Current Status, Motivations and Challenges

韓国とEUのエネルギー転換協力:現状、動機、課題 (AI 翻訳)

Huawen Shen

Studies in Social Science Research📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-12#エネルギー転換経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.22158/sssr.v7n2p49
原典: https://doi.org/10.22158/sssr.v7n2p49

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、韓国とEUのグリーンパートナーシップを対象に、クリーンエネルギー技術、サプライチェーン強靭化、国際標準設定における協力の進展を体系的に検討する。協力の動機として、類似した政策基盤、補完的な技術・産業構造、グリーン経済の機会を挙げる一方、韓国の政権交代による政策不安定性、EUのCBAMや現地化要件、米中対立によるサプライチェーンリスクなどの制約要因を分析する。

English

This paper systematically examines the Korea-EU Green Partnership, covering cooperation in clean energy technologies, supply chain resilience, and international standards. It analyzes drivers such as similar policy foundations and complementary industrial structures, while identifying constraints including South Korea's policy instability due to political turnover, the EU's CBAM and localization requirements, and geopolitical pressures from US-China rivalry.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

本稿は韓国とEUのグリーンパートナーシップの進展と課題を分析しており、日本のEUとのエネルギー転換協力やCBAMへの対応戦略を検討する上で参考になる。また、中堅国のエネルギー転換協力の論理を理解するための示唆を提供する。

In the global GX context

This analysis of Korea-EU cooperation provides a case study for middle-power countries navigating energy transition partnerships. It highlights the impact of CBAM and geopolitical tensions on supply chain resilience, offering lessons for global green partnership frameworks.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Highlights the interplay of domestic politics and international cooperation in energy transition.

🏢実務担当者:Provides context for companies involved in EU-South Korea clean energy supply chains.

🏛政策担当者:Lessons on policy continuity and CBAM compliance for middle-power countries.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The Russia-Ukraine conflict has intensified the global energy security crisis. As economies highly dependent on energy imports, the EU and South Korea are jointly facing the dual pressures of ensuring energy supply and meeting climate goals. In 2023, the two sides formally established a "Green Partnership," becoming the world's first transcontinental strategic alliance for green transition covering the entire clean energy industrial chain. This paper systematically examines the progress of Korea-EU cooperation in areas such as clean energy technologies, supply chain resilience, and international standard-setting, and analyzes the internal drivers of their cooperation, which lie in similar policy and institutional foundations, complementary technology and industrial structures, and shared opportunities for green economic development. However, the cooperation is also constrained by multiple factors: South Korea's domestic policies are prone to vacillation due to party turnover, weakening policy continuity; the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and localization requirements have increased compliance costs for Korean companies; and geopolitical pressures such as the Sino-US rivalry have triggered risks of restructuring critical mineral supply chains. The progress and dilemmas of the Korea-EU Green Partnership provide a reference for understanding the cooperation logic of middle powers in the global energy transition.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。